Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The maximum B:C ratio (2.67) was obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

A claim from Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of onion (Allium cepa) · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum B:C ratio (2.67) was obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + Se4
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
2.67e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97
e4

“The maximum gross return (Rupees 234 902.5 tonnes/ha), net returns (Rupees 171 085.1/ha) B: C ratio (2.67) and protein yield (368 kg/ha) were obtained with combined use of 100% NPK + FYM + Zn + S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1128

Title

Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of onion (Allium cepa)

SANDEEP SINGH; DHARMESH VERMA; HARENDRA SINGH; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2015. doi:10.56093/ijas.v85i9.51633

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e37e494623bf84ce813da3310e1ab1a17d59a4100f9d0d57c8c58c1f1c68904f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this claim · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

521 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.