Abstract
The effect of two N forms ( NH+4 and NO-3) and NaCl on accumulation of some essential mineral nutrients was examined in canola (Brassica napus L.) cv. ‘SLM046’. Eight-day- ld plants of were subjected for 21 day to Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing 10 mM NH+4 and NO-3 and salinized with 0, 50, 100 and 150 mm NaCl. N form and addition of NaCl to the growth had no significant effect on total N. However, root N of NH+4 supplied plants decreased significantly with increase in NaCl concentration, whereas that of NO3- supplied plants remained unaffected. Salinity of the rooting also did not show any significant effect on Na+ concentration of leaves or roots of plants subjected to two different forms of nitrogen. NH+4 treated plants generally had greater concentration of Cl- in leaves and roots and lower K+ content in leaves than NO3- supplied plants. Ca2+ concentration of leaves and roots concentration of leaves decreased in NH+4- supplied plants due to NaCl, but they remained unaffected in NO3- treated plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen form and NaCl did not significantly affect total nitrogen.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- N form and addition of NaCle0
- Outcome
- total Ne0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“N form and addition of NaCl to the growth had no significant effect on total N”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
Root nitrogen decreased with rising NaCl in ammonium supplied plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NH+4e0
- Compound
- NaCle0
- Outcome
- root Ne0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“root N of NH+4 supplied plants decreased significantly with increase in NaCl concentration”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
Root nitrogen remained unaffected by NaCl in nitrate supplied plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NO3-e0
- Outcome
- root Ne1
- Direction
- remained unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“whereas that of NO3- supplied plants remained unaffected”
t0“Canola”
e1“root N of NH+4 supplied plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity had no significant effect on leaf or root sodium concentration.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- Salinitye0
- Outcome
- Na+ concentration of leaves or rootse0
- Direction
- did not show any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Salinity of the rooting also did not show any significant effect on Na+ concentration of leaves or roots”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium supplied plants had greater chloride concentration in leaves and roots than nitrate supplied plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NH+4e0
- Outcome
- concentration of Cl- in leaves and rootse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- NO3-e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“NH+4 treated plants generally had greater concentration of Cl- in leaves and roots and lower K+ content in leaves than NO3- supplied plants”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium supplied plants had lower leaf potassium content than nitrate supplied plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NH+4e0
- Outcome
- K+ content in leavese0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- NO3-e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“NH+4 treated plants generally had greater concentration of Cl- in leaves and roots and lower K+ content in leaves than NO3- supplied plants”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
NaCl decreased calcium concentration in ammonium supplied plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NaCle0
- Outcome
- Ca2+ concentration of leaves and rootse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- NH+4- supplied plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Ca2+ concentration of leaves and roots concentration of leaves decreased in NH+4- supplied plants due to NaCl”
t0“Canola”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium concentration remained unaffected in nitrate treated plants.
- Taxon
- canola
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- NO3-e0
- Outcome
- Ca2+ concentratione1
- Direction
- remained unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“but they remained unaffected in NO3- treated plants”
t0“Canola”
e1“Ca2+ concentration of leaves and roots”
The same questions in other papers
sodium chloride · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sodium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
salinity · physiology: ion balance · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.