Paper · 2013 · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics

Impacts of Microbial Inoculants as Integrated Pest Management Tools in Apple Production

Holcer Chavez; Denis Nadolnyak; Joseph W. Kloepper

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This article analyzes the impacts of microbial inoculant (MI) technology, which is a part of integrated pest management, on the U.S. apple production using farm-level data. To test the likely production impacts suggested by agronomic literature, we estimate a pesticide use function and stochastic production functions with damage control input specification. The results show that although adoption of the MI technology does not reduce the use of pesticides, the technology has a significant positive impact on yields and is associated with higher technical production efficiency rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of microbial inoculant technology did not reduce pesticide use in U.S. apple production.

Treatment
adoption of the MI technologye0
Outcome
use of pesticidese0
Direction
does not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adoption of the MI technology does not reduce the use of pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The microbial inoculant technology had a significant positive impact on apple yields.

Treatment
the technologye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the technology has a significant positive impact on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of the microbial inoculant technology was associated with higher technical production efficiency rates in apple production.

Treatment
the technologye0
Outcome
technical production efficiency ratese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the technology has a significant positive impact on yields and is associated with higher technical production efficiency rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–87 · show in text ↑

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.