Abstract
This article analyzes the impacts of microbial inoculant (MI) technology, which is a part of integrated pest management, on the U.S. apple production using farm-level data. To test the likely production impacts suggested by agronomic literature, we estimate a pesticide use function and stochastic production functions with damage control input specification. The results show that although adoption of the MI technology does not reduce the use of pesticides, the technology has a significant positive impact on yields and is associated with higher technical production efficiency rates.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Adoption of microbial inoculant technology did not reduce pesticide use in U.S. apple production.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- adoption of the MI technologye0
- Outcome
- use of pesticidese0
- Direction
- does not reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“adoption of the MI technology does not reduce the use of pesticides”
t0“Apple Production”
Claim · model-written summary
The microbial inoculant technology had a significant positive impact on apple yields.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- the technologye0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- positive impacte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the technology has a significant positive impact on yields”
t0“Apple Production”
Claim · model-written summary
Adoption of the microbial inoculant technology was associated with higher technical production efficiency rates in apple production.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- the technologye0
- Outcome
- technical production efficiency ratese0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the technology has a significant positive impact on yields and is associated with higher technical production efficiency rates”
t0“Apple Production”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.