Abstract
Fungi tested were Glomus fasciculatum Gerd. and Trappe, Glomus mosseae Nicol. and Gerd., Glomus macrocarpum Tul. and Tul., and Glomus versiforme Berch and Trappe. Regardless of P added to the soil, VAM inoculation increased the concentration of P, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe in leaves. There was no indication of nutrient interaction between P and Zn with respect to VAM application. Plants grown with supplemental P had greater P tissue concentration than those not receiving P. The maximum nutrient concentration was observed when the plants were fertilized with 50 ppm P and inoculated with Glomus macrocarpum. The optimum nutrient concentration was found when plants were treated with 50 ppm soil application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
VAM inoculation increased leaf P, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe concentrations regardless of added P.
- Taxon
- apple seedling
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- VAM inoculatione0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- concentration of P, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Regardless of P added to the soil, VAM inoculation increased the concentration of P, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe in leaves.”
t0“apple seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
There was no indication of a P by Zn nutrient interaction with VAM application.
- Taxon
- apple seedlingMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- VAM applicatione0
- Interactor
- VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- nutrient interaction between P and Zne0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no indication of nutrient interaction between P and Zn with respect to VAM application.”
t0“apple seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental P increased plant P tissue concentration.
- Taxon
- apple seedlingMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- supplemental Pe0
- Outcome
- P tissue concentratione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- those not receiving Pe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants grown with supplemental P had greater P tissue concentration than those not receiving P.”
t0“apple seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization with 50 ppm P plus Glomus macrocarpum gave maximum nutrient concentration.
- Taxon
- apple seedlingMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 50 ppm P and inoculated with Glomus macrocarpume0
- Interactor
- Glomus macrocarpum
Glomus macrocarpume0symbiont - Outcome
- nutrient concentratione0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum nutrient concentration was observed when the plants were fertilized with 50 ppm P and inoculated with Glomus macrocarpum.”
t0“apple seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
A 50 ppm soil application gave optimum nutrient concentration.
- Taxon
- apple seedlingMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- 50 ppm soil applicatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient concentratione0
- Direction
- optimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The optimum nutrient concentration was found when plants were treated with 50 ppm soil application.”
t0“apple seedling”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.