Paper · 2009

EFFECT OF BORON AND PHOSPHORUS APPLICATION ON YIELD AND UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS IN LENTIL

Sarvesh Kumar; Vinay Singh; V. P. S. Solanki

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2006-08 at Bichpuri (Agra) to study the effect of B and P levels on the yield and nutrients uptake in lentil. The grain and straw yield of lentil increased significantly up to 4 kg B and 90 kg P2O5 /ha. The highest grain and straw yield (13.58 and 15.0 q/ha) at 4 kg B/ha was 12.6 and 20.0% higher in comparison to the yield at control. Similarly 90 kg P2O5 /ha produced highest grain and straw yield (15.47 and 18.18 g/ha), which was 46.8 and 45.0% higher compared to control. Thus, application of phosphorus gave higher yield than of boron. Application of B and P increased significantly the uptake of N, P and B in grain and straw over control. Protein content and yield of lentil grain also increased significantly with B and P application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 kg B/ha, lentil grain yield reached 13.58 q/ha, 12.6% above control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
4 kg B/hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.58e0
Qualifier
12.6e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yield (13.58 and 15.0 q/ha) at 4 kg B/ha was 12.6 and 20.0% higher in comparison to the yield at control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–376 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4 kg B/ha, lentil straw yield reached 15.0 q/ha, 20.0% above control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
4 kg B/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.0 q/hae0
Qualifier
20.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yield (13.58 and 15.0 q/ha) at 4 kg B/ha was 12.6 and 20.0% higher in comparison to the yield at control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–376 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg P2O5 /ha, lentil grain yield reached 15.47 g/ha, 46.8% above control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
90 kg P2O5 /hae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.47e0
Qualifier
46.8e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90 kg P2O5 /ha produced highest grain and straw yield (15.47 and 18.18 g/ha), which was 46.8 and 45.0% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg P2O5 /ha, lentil straw yield reached 18.18 g/ha, 45.0% above control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
90 kg P2O5 /hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.18 g/hae0
Qualifier
45.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90 kg P2O5 /ha produced highest grain and straw yield (15.47 and 18.18 g/ha), which was 46.8 and 45.0% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application gave higher lentil yield than boron application.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
application of phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
borone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus gave higher yield than of boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron and phosphorus application significantly increased N, P and B uptake in lentil grain and straw relative to control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
Application of B and Pe0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and B in grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of B and P increased significantly the uptake of N, P and B in grain and straw over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron and phosphorus application significantly increased lentil grain protein content.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
B and P applicatione0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and yield of lentil grain also increased significantly with B and P application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron and phosphorus application significantly increased lentil grain protein yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
B and P applicatione0
Outcome
yield of lentil graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and yield of lentil grain also increased significantly with B and P application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–784 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.