Paper · 2015 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Different Soil Texture on Peanut Growth and Development

C. X. Zhao; L. H. Jia; Y. F. Wang; et al.

12
claims
17
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of different soil textures (namely sand, loam, and clay) on peanut growth and development were investigated using the carton planting method. The results showed that sand is conducive to the growth of stems and leaves of peanuts in the early growth period, loam is conducive to the growth of stems and leaves in the middle and late periods, and clay is not conducive to the growth of stems and leaves of peanuts throughout the entire growth period. Soil texture had a significant effect on the number of peanut flowers. This is because the amount of flowering peanuts was insufficient in the clay. Although the amount of flowering peanuts was large in the sand, the peanuts mainly flowered in the late period, and there was a large amount of fruitless flowers. In the loam, the peanuts mainly flowered in the early period, and there was a large amount of fruitful flowers. The difference in the total number of pegs between the sand and loam was not significant, but either had more pegs than when grown in clay. Peanuts accumulated pod dry matter quickly in the sand early in the season, but pod growth slowed later in the season. The pod dry matter in the loam was accumulated mostly in the middle and late periods. Clay was not conducive to pod dry-matter accumulation. The moderate aeration and water and fertility retention of the loam was more suitable for peanut growth and development, as well as yield formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand favored peanut stem and leaf growth early.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Organ / stage
early growth periode0
Treatment
sande0
Outcome
growth of stems and leavese0
Direction
conducivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sand is conducive to the growth of stems and leaves of peanuts in the early growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loam favored peanut stem and leaf growth in middle and late periods.

Organ / stage
middle and late periodse0
Treatment
loame0
Outcome
growth of stems and leavese0
Direction
conducivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“loam is conducive to the growth of stems and leaves in the middle and late periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay was unfavorable for peanut stem and leaf growth throughout growth.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Organ / stage
entire growth periode0
Treatment
claye0
Outcome
growth of stems and leavese0
Direction
not conducivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clay is not conducive to the growth of stems and leaves of peanuts throughout the entire growth period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay had insufficient peanut flowering.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
amount of floweringe0
Setting
claye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of flowering peanuts was insufficient in the clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sand, peanut flowering was abundant but predominantly late and often fruitless.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
flowered in the late periode0
Setting
sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the amount of flowering peanuts was large in the sand, the peanuts mainly flowered in the late period, and there was a large amount of fruitless flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–771 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loam, peanut flowering was predominantly early and produced many fruitful flowers.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
flowered in the early periode0
Setting
loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the loam, the peanuts mainly flowered in the early period, and there was a large amount of fruitful flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total peg numbers did not differ significantly between sand and loam.

Treatment
sande0
Outcome
total number of pegse0
Direction
differencee0
Comparator
loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in the total number of pegs between the sand and loam was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand and loam produced more peanut pegs than clay.

Treatment
sand and loame0
Outcome
pegse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
claye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The difference in the total number of pegs between the sand and loam was not significant, but either had more pegs than when grown in clay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut pod dry matter accumulated rapidly early in sand, then pod growth slowed.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
pod dry mattere0
Setting
sande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanuts accumulated pod dry matter quickly in the sand early in the season, but pod growth slowed later in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In loam, peanut pod dry matter accumulated mostly during middle and late periods.

Outcome
pod dry mattere0
Setting
loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pod dry matter in the loam was accumulated mostly in the middle and late periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay was unfavorable for peanut pod dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
Claye0
Outcome
pod dry-matter accumulatione0
Direction
not conducivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clay was not conducive to pod dry-matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regarded loam as more suitable for peanut growth, development and yield formation.

Outcome
more suitable for peanut growth and development, as well as yield formatione0
Setting
loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The moderate aeration and water and fertility retention of the loam was more suitable for peanut growth and development, as well as yield formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1432 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.