Abstract
The study was conducted in two 0.5 ha-organic vineyards in Manisa Province in 2000 and 2001 to determine the effects of different manuring programs on yield and quality of fresh and dried grapes in the Round seedless (= Round sultana) variety. Different combinations of farmyard manure, green manure and E-2001 tested in the trial did not have any statistically significant effect on table grape yield, average bunch weight, 100 berry weight, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity in both vineyards. The highest increase in fresh grape yield compared to non-treated plots was measured as 12.8 % in GM+E-2001 application in the grafted vineyard, compared with as 25.4 % in GM+FM+E-2001 application of self-rooted vineyard. Different manuring treatments did not have statistically significant effects on investigated parameters of dried grape in both vineyards with the exception of 100 dried berries weight in 2001 and expertise score in 2000 of the non-grafted vineyard. However, taking into consideration the improvements obtained by the tested manure applications compared to non-treated controls in two years, higher performance with statistical significance can be expected on the long term.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Manuring combinations did not significantly affect table grape yield, bunch weight, berry weight, soluble solids or acidity.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Treatment
- Different combinations of farmyard manure, green manure and E-2001e0
- Outcome
- table grape yield, average bunch weight, 100 berry weight, total soluble solids, and titratable aciditye0
- Direction
- did not have any statistically significant effecte0
- Setting
- both vineyardse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Different combinations of farmyard manure, green manure and E-2001 tested in the trial did not have any statistically significant effect on table grape yield, average bunch weight, 100 berry weight, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity in both vineyards”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
GM+E-2001 gave the highest fresh grape yield increase of 12.8% in the grafted vineyard.
Verbatim
e0“The highest increase in fresh grape yield compared to non-treated plots was measured as 12.8 % in GM+E-2001 application in the grafted vineyard”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
GM+FM+E-2001 gave a 25.4% fresh grape yield increase in the self rooted vineyard.
Verbatim
e0“compared with as 25.4 % in GM+FM+E-2001 application of self-rooted vineyard”
t0“Grape”
e1“The highest increase in fresh grape yield compared to non-treated plots was measured as 12.8 % in GM+E-2001 application in the grafted vineyard”
Claim · model-written summary
Manuring treatments generally did not significantly affect dried grape parameters.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Treatment
- Different manuring treatmentse0
- Outcome
- investigated parameters of dried grapee0
- Direction
- did not have statistically significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- with the exception of 100 dried berries weight in 2001 and expertise score in 2000 of the non-grafted vineyarde0
- Setting
- both vineyardse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Different manuring treatments did not have statistically significant effects on investigated parameters of dried grape in both vineyards with the exception of 100 dried berries weight in 2001 and expertise score in 2000 of the non-grafted vineyard”
t0“Grape”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors expect stronger long term performance from manure applications.
Verbatim
e0“higher performance with statistical significance can be expected on the long term”
t0“Grape”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →transgenic · yield · VitisResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.