Paper · 1974 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Phytochrome action in Oryza sativa L. VII. Effects of light and aeration on coleoptile growth under submerged conditions

Che-Jun Pjon; Masaki Furuya

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Coleoptile growth of intact rice seedlings under submerged conditions was not much affected by the continuous irradiation of red light. But, if aerated, growth was strongly inhibited by a low-energy brief irradiation of red light, and this red light-induced effect was reversed by a brief exposure to far-red light. The responses to red and far-red light were repeatedly reversible. The amount of photometrically detectable phytochrome in non-aerated coleoptile tissues was found to be as low as one third that in aerated ones. After the conversion of Pr to Pfr by a brief red irradiation, the total Δ (ΔA) of the aerated tissues decreased to about one fifth that of the original level within 6 hr at 24°C, while the Pfr in the non-aerated tissues was significantly less decayed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coleoptile growth of intact rice seedlings under submerged conditions was not much affected by continuous red light irradiation.

Treatment
continuous irradiation of red lighte0
Outcome
Coleoptile growthe0
Direction
not much affectede0
Qualifier
submerged conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coleoptile growth of intact rice seedlings under submerged conditions was not much affected by the continuous irradiation of red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

If aerated, coleoptile growth of submerged rice seedlings was strongly inhibited by a low-energy brief irradiation of red light.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
low-energy brief irradiation of red lighte0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
strongly inhibitede0
Qualifier
if aeratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“if aerated, growth was strongly inhibited by a low-energy brief irradiation of red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The red light-induced inhibition of growth was reversed by a brief exposure to far-red light.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
brief exposure to far-red lighte0
Outcome
red light-induced effecte0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“this red light-induced effect was reversed by a brief exposure to far-red light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The responses to red and far-red light were repeatedly reversible.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Outcome
responses to red and far-red lighte0
Direction
repeatedly reversiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The responses to red and far-red light were repeatedly reversible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photometrically detectable phytochrome in non-aerated coleoptile tissues was as low as one third of that in aerated tissues.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Organ / stage
coleoptile tissuese0
Treatment
non-aeratede0
Outcome
amount of photometrically detectable phytochromee0
Direction
lowe0
Value
one thirde0
Comparator
aerated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of photometrically detectable phytochrome in non-aerated coleoptile tissues was found to be as low as one third that in aerated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After conversion of Pr to Pfr by a brief red irradiation, the total delta A of aerated tissues decreased to about one fifth of the original level within 6 hr at 24 C.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
brief red irradiatione0
Outcome
total Δ (ΔA)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about one fifthe0
Qualifier
within 6 hr at 24°Ce0
Comparator
the original levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“After the conversion of Pr to Pfr by a brief red irradiation, the total Δ (ΔA) of the aerated tissues decreased to about one fifth that of the original level within 6 hr at 24°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pfr in the non-aerated tissues was significantly less decayed.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativat0
Treatment
non-aeratede0
Outcome
Pfre0
Direction
less decayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Oryza sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Pfr in the non-aerated tissues was significantly less decayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–778 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

84 papers: 22 positive, 62 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.