Paper · 1993 · HortScience

LONG-DURATION EXPOSURE FACILITY (LDEF) OF NASA HAS LITTLE DELETERIOUS EFFECT ON CUCUMBER SEEDS

Todd C. Wehner

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L.) production during sustained space missions depends on reliable seed storage and seedling growth in a production facility aboard the space vehicle. NASA sent a space platform, the LDEF, into earth orbit aboard the shuttle Challenger in April 1984. It was retrieved by the shuttle Columbia in January 1990. Cucumber seeds were stored with several levels of protection (constituting 6 treatments) aboard LDEF. Field tests were run at Clinton, NC with 2 seasons, 4 replications, 4 harvests, and 12 seed treatments (including 6 controls). Traits measured included seedling emergence and abnormalities, vine growth, flowering and yield. The largest effects were for percentage emergence, where the seeds receiving the least protection (little cover, vented to outer space) had 40% emergence compared with 80% for the control. There were a large number of seedling abnormalities in the vented treatments, with cotyledon mutants most common, followed by true leaf, then stem. The least protected treatment had 75% abnormalities (mostly minor), compared with 30% for the control. However, plants recovered rapidly, so yield, earliness, percentage cull fruits, and disease incidence were not significantly affected by storage on LDEF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Least-protected orbital cucumber seeds had 40% emergence versus 80% in controls.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
least protection (little cover, vented to outer space)e0
Outcome
emergencee0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
80%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeds receiving the least protection (little cover, vented to outer space) had 40% emergence compared with 80% for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vented treatments produced many seedling abnormalities, most often in cotyledons.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Treatment
vented treatmentse0
Outcome
seedling abnormalitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were a large number of seedling abnormalities in the vented treatments, with cotyledon mutants most common, followed by true leaf, then stem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The least-protected treatment yielded 75% abnormalities versus 30% in controls.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
least protected treatmente0
Outcome
abnormalitiese0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
30%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least protected treatment had 75% abnormalities (mostly minor), compared with 30% for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Affected cucumber plants recovered rapidly.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Outcome
recovered rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants recovered rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Orbital seed storage did not significantly affect yield, earliness, cull fruits or disease incidence.

Taxon
CUCUMBERCucumis sativust0
Treatment
storage on LDEFe0
Outcome
yield, earliness, percentage cull fruits, and disease incidencee0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield, earliness, percentage cull fruits, and disease incidence were not significantly affected by storage on LDEF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCUMBER SEEDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–94 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.