Paper · 1998 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Nitrogen availability as affected by ten years of cover crop and tillage systems in southern Brazil

T.J.C Amado; S.B. Fernandez; J. Mielniczuk

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conservation tillage and cover crops are useful tools in Brazil for restoring degraded soils that resulted from the rapid expansion of agriculture without proper management during the 1970s. In 1985, a long-term study was initiated on a degraded Paleudult in the state of Rio Grande do Sul to better understand the impact of these soil management practices on nitrogen (N) dynamics in corn production systems. The systems include both conventional and no-tillage with oat/com, vetch/corn and oat + vetch/corn, + cowpea (intensive). After nine years, no-tillage with the intensive cropping system resulted in a 24% increase in soil N as compared to conventional tillage; there was no difference in corn yield between tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage under intensive cropping increased soil nitrogen by 24% relative to conventional tillage after nine years.

Treatment
no-tillage with the intensive cropping systeme0
Outcome
soil Ne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
Rio Grande do Sule1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After nine years, no-tillage with the intensive cropping system resulted in a 24% increase in soil N as compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rio Grande do Sul to better understand the impact of these soil management practices on nitrogen (N) dynamics in corn production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield did not differ between tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no difference in corn yield between tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–731 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.