Paper · 1966 · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

IRRADIATION OF DUNCAN GRAPEFRUIT, PINEAPPLE, AND VALENCIA ORANGES AND TEMPLES.

R.A. Dennison; W. Grierson; E. M. AHMED

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Irradiation with dosages above 100 krad in duced some decay reduction in Pineapple and Valencia oranges stored at 70 F for 21 days without diphenyl pads. At 40 F there was less spoilage for the Temple fruit; with diphenyl pads and storage at 40 F there was less spoilage of Pineapple oranges. The citrus fruits exami ned showed irradiation induced peel injury. Tem ple fruit were the least susceptible to peel injury. The severity of peel injury was greater as the radiation doses increased or the storage temper ature and duration increased. Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations Journal Series No. 2543. lDepartment of Food Science, University of Florida, Gainesville. 2University of Florida Citrus Experiment Station, Lake Alfred. There were no differences in the organoleptic quality attributes of irradiated grapefruit stored 19 and 20 days at 65 and 58 F, respectively. No differences were observed in the color or consistency of juice expressed from irradiated Valencia oranges, but a lower flavor rating was obtained from the 300 krad level. Sections from Temple fruit irradiated with dosages in excess of 100 krad and stored 7 days at 35 and 50 F were softer and had less acceptable flavor. How ever, by extending the storage period to 13 days, no differences were observed in the flavor of Temples stored at 50 F. In view of the severity of peel injury irradia tion cannot be recommended for preservation of Florida citrus fruits. Introduction There is a widespread interest in the use of gamma radiation for the extension of shelf life of citrus fruits. While decay organisms can be inactivated by adequate dosages of gamma Table 1. Effects of irradiation, storage temperature and duration, and diphenyl on decay (%) and peel injury (points scale) in Duncan grapefruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation above 100 krad reduced decay in Pineapple and Valencia oranges stored at 70 F for 21 days without diphenyl pads.

Taxon
Pineapple and Valencia orangesCitrus sinensisAnanas comosuse0
Treatment
Irradiation with dosages above 100 krade0
Outcome
decaye0
Direction
reductione0
Setting
stored at 70 F for 21 days without diphenyl padse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ananas comosus
Ananas comosus · TaxonVpuipV ,pemegang hak cipta · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation with dosages above 100 krad in duced some decay reduction in Pineapple and Valencia oranges stored at 70 F for 21 days without diphenyl pads.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–153 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temple fruit had less spoilage at 40 F.

Taxon
Temple fruite0
Outcome
spoilagee0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
40 Fe0

Verbatim

e0

“At 40 F there was less spoilage for the Temple fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pineapple oranges stored at 40 F with diphenyl pads had less spoilage.

Taxon
Pineapple orangese0
Treatment
diphenyl padse0
Outcome
spoilagee0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
storage at 40 Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“with diphenyl pads and storage at 40 F there was less spoilage of Pineapple oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation caused peel injury in the examined citrus fruits.

Taxon
citrus fruitsCitruse0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
peel injurye0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The citrus fruits exami ned showed irradiation induced peel injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temple fruit was least susceptible to peel injury.

Taxon
Tem ple fruite0
Outcome
peel injurye0
Direction
least susceptiblee0

Verbatim

e0

“Tem ple fruit were the least susceptible to peel injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–417 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peel injury became more severe with increasing radiation dose or storage temperature and duration.

Treatment
radiation dosese0
Outcome
severity of peel injurye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The severity of peel injury was greater as the radiation doses increased or the storage temper ature and duration increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated grapefruit showed no difference in organoleptic quality after the stated storage periods.

Taxon
grapefruitCitrus ×paradisie0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
organoleptic quality attributese0
Direction
no differencese0
Setting
stored 19 and 20 days at 65 and 58 Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x paradisi
Citrus ×paradisi · TaxonAmada44 · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in the organoleptic quality attributes of irradiated grapefruit stored 19 and 20 days at 65 and 58 F, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated Valencia orange juice showed no difference in color or consistency.

Taxon
Valencia orangesCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
irradiatede0
Outcome
color or consistency of juicee0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were observed in the color or consistency of juice expressed from irradiated Valencia oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valencia oranges irradiated at 300 krad received a lower flavor rating.

Taxon
VALENCIA ORANGESt0
Treatment
300 krade0
Outcome
flavor ratinge0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a lower flavor rating was obtained from the 300 krad level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“VALENCIA ORANGES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temple sections irradiated above 100 krad and stored seven days were softer and had less acceptable flavor.

Taxon
Temple fruite0
Treatment
irradiated with dosages in excess of 100 krade0
Outcome
softer and had less acceptable flavore0
Setting
stored 7 days at 35 and 50 Fe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sections from Temple fruit irradiated with dosages in excess of 100 krad and stored 7 days at 35 and 50 F were softer and had less acceptable flavor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After storage was extended to 13 days, irradiated Temples at 50 F showed no flavor difference.

Taxon
Templese0
Treatment
extending the storage period to 13 dayse0
Outcome
flavore0
Direction
no differencese0
Setting
50 Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“by extending the storage period to 13 days, no differences were observed in the flavor of Temples stored at 50 F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend irradiation for preservation of Florida citrus fruits because of peel injury.

Taxon
Florida citrus fruitse0
Outcome
irradia tion cannot be recommended for preservatione0
Qualifier
severity of peel injurye0

Verbatim

e0

“In view of the severity of peel injury irradia tion cannot be recommended for preservation of Florida citrus fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1443 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

radiation · disease · Ananas comosus (pineapple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

radiation · quality: general · Citrus x paradisi (grapefruit)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

radiation · disease · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.