Abstract
Growth retardants, CCC, Amo-1618, Phosfon-D and B-995, applied during seed vernalization inhibited the ear development of winter wheat. CCC applied during green plant vernalization inhibited flowering, but it had no appreciable effect on the final stem length. The inhibition by CCC was reversed by foliar application of gibberellin. On the other hand, CCC applied after the vernalization period affected the final stem length but not flowering. The amount of endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s) was greater in the vernalized plant than in the non-vernalized plant. No gibberellin-like substance was detected in the CCC-treated plant. Endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s), whose biosynthesis is inhibited by some growth retardants, may play a part in the vernalization process in winter wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
CCC during seed vernalization inhibited winter wheat ear development.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- ear developmente0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- seed vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth retardants, CCC, Amo-1618, Phosfon-D and B-995, applied during seed vernalization inhibited the ear development of winter wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Amo-1618 during seed vernalization inhibited winter wheat ear development.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Amo-1618e0
- Outcome
- ear developmente0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- seed vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth retardants, CCC, Amo-1618, Phosfon-D and B-995, applied during seed vernalization inhibited the ear development of winter wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosfon-D during seed vernalization inhibited winter wheat ear development.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Phosfon-De0
- Outcome
- ear developmente0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- seed vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth retardants, CCC, Amo-1618, Phosfon-D and B-995, applied during seed vernalization inhibited the ear development of winter wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
B-995 during seed vernalization inhibited winter wheat ear development.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- B-995e0
- Outcome
- ear developmente0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- seed vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth retardants, CCC, Amo-1618, Phosfon-D and B-995, applied during seed vernalization inhibited the ear development of winter wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC during green plant vernalization inhibited flowering.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- green plant vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC applied during green plant vernalization inhibited flowering, but it had no appreciable effect on the final stem length.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC during green plant vernalization had no appreciable effect on final stem length.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- final stem lengthe0
- Direction
- no appreciable effecte0
- Qualifier
- green plant vernalizatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC applied during green plant vernalization inhibited flowering, but it had no appreciable effect on the final stem length.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar gibberellin reversed CCC inhibition of flowering.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of gibberelline0
- Outcome
- inhibitione0
- Direction
- reversede0
- Comparator
- CCCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The inhibition by CCC was reversed by foliar application of gibberellin.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC after vernalization affected final stem length.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- final stem lengthe0
- Qualifier
- after the vernalization periode0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC applied after the vernalization period affected the final stem length but not flowering.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC after vernalization did not affect flowering.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CCCe0
- Outcome
- floweringe0
- Direction
- note0
- Qualifier
- after the vernalization periode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC applied after the vernalization period affected the final stem length but not flowering.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Vernalized plants contained more endogenous gibberellin-like substances than non-vernalized plants.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- vernalized plante0
- Outcome
- amount of endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- non-vernalized plante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The amount of endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s) was greater in the vernalized plant than in the non-vernalized plant.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
No gibberellin-like substance was detected in CCC-treated plants.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CCC-treated plante0
- Outcome
- gibberellin-like substancee0
- Direction
- Noe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No gibberellin-like substance was detected in the CCC-treated plant.”
t0“WINTER WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest endogenous gibberellin-like substances participate in vernalization.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- vernalization processe0
- Qualifier
- Endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Endogenous gibberellin-like substance(s), whose biosynthesis is inhibited by some growth retardants, may play a part in the vernalization process in winter wheat.”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →chlormequat chloride · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
class · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.