Paper · 2015 · Grass and Forage Science

Herbage and nitrogen yields, fixation and transfer by white clover to companion grasses in grazed swards under different rates of nitrogen fertilization

D. Enriquez‐Hidalgo; T. J. Gilliland; D. Hennessy

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In grass–legume swards, biologically fixed nitrogen ( N ) from the legume can support the N requirements of the grass, but legume N fixation is suppressed by additional fertilizer N application. This study sought to identify a fertilizer N application rate that maximizes herbage and N yields, N fixation and apparent N transfer from white clover to companion grasses under intensive grazing at a site with high soil‐N status. During a 3‐year period (2011–2013), swards of perennial ryegrass and of perennial ryegrass–white clover, receiving up to 240 kg N ha −1 year −1 , were compared using isotope dilution and N ‐difference methods. The presence of white clover increased herbage and N yields by 12–44% and 26–72%, respectively. Applications of N fertilizer reduced sward white clover content, but the effect was less at below 120 kg N ha −1 . The proportion of N derived from the atmospheric N fixation was 25–70%. Nitrogen fixation ranged from 25 to 142 kg N ha −1 measured using the isotope dilution method in 2012 and from 52 to 291 kg N ha −1 using the N ‐difference method across all years. Fertilizer N application reduced the percentage and yield of fixed N. Transfer of N from white clover to grass was not confirmed, but there was an increased N content in grass and soil‐ N levels. Under intensive grazing, the maximum applied N rate that optimized herbage and N yields with minimal effect on white clover content and fixation rates was 60–120 kg N ha −1 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of white clover increased herbage yield by 12–44% relative to perennial ryegrass swards.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
presence of white clovere0
Outcome
herbagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12–44%e0
Comparator
perennial ryegrasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of white clover increased herbage and N yields by 12–44% and 26–72%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“swards of perennial ryegrass and of perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of white clover increased N yield by 26–72% relative to perennial ryegrass swards.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
presence of white clovere0
Outcome
N yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26–72%e0
Comparator
perennial ryegrasse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of white clover increased herbage and N yields by 12–44% and 26–72%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“swards of perennial ryegrass and of perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilizer application reduced the white clover content of the sward.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
Applications of N fertilizere0
Outcome
sward white clover contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of N fertilizer reduced sward white clover content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proportion of N derived from atmospheric N fixation was 25–70%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
proportion of N derived from the atmospheric N fixatione0
Value
25–70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“The proportion of N derived from the atmospheric N fixation was 25–70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–927 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation ranged from 25 to 142 kg N per ha by the isotope dilution method in 2012.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
Nitrogen fixatione0
Value
25 to 142 kg N hae0
Qualifier
isotope dilution method in 2012e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fixation ranged from 25 to 142 kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“measured using the isotope dilution method in 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixation ranged from 52 to 291 kg N per ha by the N-difference method across all years.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
Nitrogen fixatione0
Value
52 to 291 kg N hae1
Qualifier
across all yearse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fixation ranged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“from 52 to 291 kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1057 · show in text ↑
e2

“across all years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N application reduced the percentage and yield of fixed N.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Fertilizer N applicatione0
Outcome
percentage and yield of fixed Ne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fertilizer N application reduced the percentage and yield of fixed N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transfer of N from white clover to grass was not confirmed.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
Transfer of N from white clover to grasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transfer of N from white clover to grass was not confirmed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1238 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N content of the grass increased.

Taxon
grasse0
Outcome
N content in grasse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“there was an increased N content in grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1285 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under intensive grazing the maximum N rate that optimized herbage and N yields with minimal effect on white clover content and fixation was 60–120 kg N per ha.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Outcome
maximum applied N ratee0
Value
60–120 kg N hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum applied N rate that optimized herbage and N yields with minimal effect on white clover content and fixation rates was 60–120 kg N ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1475 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

24 papers: 11 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.