Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research

INFLUENCE OF COMPOST AND BIOFERTILIZER ON YIELD AND ESSENTIAL OIL OF DILL (ANETHUM GRAVEOLENS L.)

Shahmohammadi Farnaz; Darzi Mohammad Taghi; Haj Seyed Hadi Mohammadreza

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the influence of compost and biofertilizer on yield and essential oil of dill (Anethum graveolens L.), an experiment was conducted as factorial experiment in the base of randomized complete blocks design with eight treatments and three replications at research field of Agriculture Company of Ran in Firouzkuh of Iran in 2012. The factors were compost in four levels (0, 5, 10 and 15 ton/ha) and biofertilizer, mixture of Azotobacter chroococcumandAzospirillum lipoferum in two levels (non-inoculated and inoculated seeds). The present results have shown that compost had significant effects on evaluated traits except essential oil content, as the highest seed yield and essential oil yield after using 10 ton/ha compost and the maximum biological yield after applying 15 ton/ha compost were obtained. Biofertilizer also showed significant effects on mentioned traits except essential oil content. The highest biological yield, seed yield and essential oil yield were obtained by using the biofertilizer (inoculated seeds). Generally, the maximum seed yield and essential oil yield were obtained with the application of 10 ton/ha compost and biofertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost significantly affected evaluated traits except essential oil content.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
evaluated traitse0
Qualifier
except essential oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost had significant effects on evaluated traits except essential oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost did not significantly affect essential oil content.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
essential oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compost had significant effects on evaluated traits except essential oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–658 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 ton/ha compost gave the highest seed and essential oil yields.

Treatment
10 ton/ha composte0
Outcome
seed yield and essential oil yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest seed yield and essential oil yield after using 10 ton/ha compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15 ton/ha compost gave maximum biological yield.

Treatment
15 ton/ha composte0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum biological yield after applying 15 ton/ha compost were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly affected yield traits except essential oil content.

Treatment
Biofertilizere0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume2symbiont
Outcome
mentioned traitse0
Qualifier
except essential oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer also showed significant effects on mentioned traits except essential oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“biofertilizer, mixture of Azotobacter chroococcumandAzospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer did not significantly affect essential oil content.

Treatment
Biofertilizere0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume2symbiont
Outcome
essential oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer also showed significant effects on mentioned traits except essential oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–916 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“biofertilizer, mixture of Azotobacter chroococcumandAzospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated seeds gave the highest biological, seed and essential oil yields.

Treatment
biofertilizer (inoculated seeds)e0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume2symbiont
Outcome
biological yield, seed yield and essential oil yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest biological yield, seed yield and essential oil yield were obtained by using the biofertilizer (inoculated seeds).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1042 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“biofertilizer, mixture of Azotobacter chroococcumandAzospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 ton/ha compost combined with biofertilizer gave maximum seed and essential oil yields.

Treatment
10 ton/ha compost and biofertilizere0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume2symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume2symbiont
Outcome
seed yield and essential oil yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, the maximum seed yield and essential oil yield were obtained with the application of 10 ton/ha compost and biofertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1175 · show in text ↑
e1

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“biofertilizer, mixture of Azotobacter chroococcumandAzospirillum lipoferum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–488 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · Azotobacter chroococcum · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.