Paper · 2014 · Organic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Application of different fertilizers on morphological traits of dill (Anethum graveolens L.)

Fatemeh Nejatzadeh-Barandozi; Fathollah Gholami-Borujeni

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nitroxin biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer on the growth, yield, and essential oil composition of dill. The experiment was conducted under field condition in randomized complete block design with three replications and two factors. RESULTS: The first factor was the concentrations of nitroxin biofertilizer (0%, 50%, and 100%) of the recommended amount (1 l of biological fertilizer for 30 kg of seed). The second factor was the following chemical fertilizer treatments: no fertilizer (control) and 50 and 100 kg ha(-1) urea along with 300 kg ha(-1) ammonium phosphate. Different characteristics such as plant height, number of umbel per plant, number of umbellet per umbel, number of grain per umbellet, 1,000 seed weight, grain yield, biological yield, and oil percentage were recorded. According to the results, the highest height, biological yield, and grain yield components (except harvest index) were obtained on biological fertilizer. The results showed the highest essential oil content detected in biological fertilizer and chemical fertilizer. Identification of essential oil composition showed that the content of carvone increased with the application of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. The results indicated that the application of biofertilizers enhanced yield and other plant criteria in this plant. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, it seems that the use of biofertilizers or combinations of biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer could improve dill performance in addition to reduction of environmental pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilizer produced the highest plant height.

Treatment
biological fertilizere0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest height, biological yield, and grain yield components (except harvest index) were obtained on biological fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilizer produced the highest biological yield.

Treatment
biological fertilizere0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest height, biological yield, and grain yield components (except harvest index) were obtained on biological fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological fertilizer produced the highest grain yield components except harvest index.

Treatment
biological fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yield componentse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
except harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest height, biological yield, and grain yield components (except harvest index) were obtained on biological fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil content was highest with biological and chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
biological fertilizer and chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
essential oil contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest essential oil content detected in biological fertilizer and chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers increased carvone content.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
content of carvonee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of carvone increased with the application of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizers increased carvone content.

Treatment
chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
content of carvonee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of carvone increased with the application of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers enhanced yield and other plant criteria.

Treatment
biofertilizerse0
Outcome
yield and other plant criteriae0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of biofertilizers enhanced yield and other plant criteria in this plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend biofertilizer or combinations with chemical fertilizer to improve dill performance and reduce environmental pollution.

Outcome
improve dill performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of biofertilizers or combinations of biofertilizer and chemical fertilizer could improve dill performance in addition to reduction of environmental pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1597 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.