Abstract
This experiment was conducted to study the effect of foliar fertilizer (Oligo green HF), Gibberellin and Naphthelene acetic acid and their interaction on some vegetative and anatomical Characters of Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) cv. local. The foliar fertilizer, (contains Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu and B), was used at rates of 0, 50, 100 and 150mg/L while the GA3 was used at concentrations of 250 and 500mg/L and NAA at concentrations of 600 and 1000mg/L. The results show that foliar fertilizer and both growth regulators increased plant height, stem diameter and shoot dry weight in proportion to increase in the concentrations used. Number of branches did not affected by the application of growth regulators but they increased significantly by the foliar fertilizer treatments. Also, the lower concentrations of the two growth regulators show no effect on number of leaves while all rates of the foliar fertilizer increased the number significantly. All rates of foliar fertilizer caused significant increase in cortex thickness, number and thickness of vascular bundles and vascular units diameter. Also, all growth regulators concentrations increased significantly cortex thickness but they have no effect on vascular bundles number. Vascular bundles thickness and vascular units diameter decreased significantly under the effect of both growth regulators. Pith thickness decreased significantly as the foliar fertilizer rates increased but it increased significantly due to the use of the growth regulators. Interaction between foliar fertilizer and gibberellin or naphthalene acetic acid had significant effect on most characters studied. It can be concluded that all characters studied are positively affected by factors under consideration.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilizer increased dill height, stem diameter and shoot dry weight with concentration.
- Taxon
- dill
Anethum graveolenst0 - Treatment
- foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant height, stem diameter and shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar fertilizer and both growth regulators increased plant height, stem diameter and shoot dry weight in proportion to increase in the concentrations used”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Both growth regulators increased dill height, stem diameter and shoot dry weight with concentration.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- both growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- plant height, stem diameter and shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar fertilizer and both growth regulators increased plant height, stem diameter and shoot dry weight in proportion to increase in the concentrations used”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators did not affect dill branch number.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- Number of branchese0
- Direction
- did not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of branches did not affected by the application of growth regulators”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilizer significantly increased dill branch number.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizer treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Number of branchese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of branches did not affected by the application of growth regulators but they increased significantly by the foliar fertilizer treatments”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower concentrations of growth regulators did not affect dill leaf number.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- lower concentrations of the two growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lower concentrations of the two growth regulators show no effect on number of leaves”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar fertilizer rates significantly increased dill leaf number.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all rates of the foliar fertilizer increased the number significantly”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar fertilizer rates significantly increased cortex thickness, vascular bundle number and thickness.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- cortex thickness, number and thickness of vascular bundlese0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All rates of foliar fertilizer caused significant increase in cortex thickness, number and thickness of vascular bundles and vascular units diameter”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
All foliar fertilizer rates significantly increased vascular unit diameter.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- vascular units diametere0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All rates of foliar fertilizer caused significant increase in cortex thickness, number and thickness of vascular bundles and vascular units diameter”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
All growth regulator concentrations significantly increased dill cortex thickness.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- cortex thicknesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all growth regulators concentrations increased significantly cortex thickness”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators did not affect vascular bundle number.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Outcome
- vascular bundles numbere0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they have no effect on vascular bundles number”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators significantly reduced vascular bundle thickness and vascular unit diameter.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- both growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- Vascular bundles thickness and vascular units diametere0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Vascular bundles thickness and vascular units diameter decreased significantly under the effect of both growth regulators”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing foliar fertilizer rates significantly decreased pith thickness.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizer ratese0
- Outcome
- Pith thicknesse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pith thickness decreased significantly as the foliar fertilizer rates increased”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators significantly increased pith thickness.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- growth regulatorse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it increased significantly due to the use of the growth regulators”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer interactions with gibberellin or naphthalene acetic acid significantly affected most characters.
- Taxon
- dillAnethum graveolenst0
- Treatment
- foliar fertilizer and gibberellin or naphthalene acetic acide0
- Outcome
- most characters studiede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Interaction between foliar fertilizer and gibberellin or naphthalene acetic acid had significant effect on most characters studied”
t0“dill (Anethum graveolens L.)”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →application · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · yield · Anethum graveolens (dill)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.