Paper · 1992 · HortScience

ESTABLISHMENT OF `GULFCOAST' SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY

James M. Spiers

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a 1989 field study, `Gulfcoast' southern highbush blueberry plants were subjected to irrigation [8 liters per week (low) and 30 liters per week (high)], mulching (none and 15 cm height), row height (level and raised 10-15 cm), and soil incorporated peat (none and 15 liters in each planting hole) treatments at establishment. Plants were grown on a well-drained fine sandy loam soil that contained < 1.0% organic matter. Plant volume was increased by either mulching, high irrigation, incorporated peat moss or level beds. Fruit yields were not significantly affected by irrigation levels but were highest with either mulching, level beds or incorporated peat moss. The bed height X mulching interaction indicated that mulching increased yield more with level beds than with raised beds. Plants grown with the combination of mulching, level beds, incorporated peat moss, and high irrigation levels yielded 1.1 kg per plant or approximately 10 times more than plants grown without mulch, with raised beds, without peat moss, and with the low rates of irrigation. Of the 4 establishment practices evaluated, mulching had the greatest influence on plant growth and fruiting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased plant volume of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
mulchinge1
Outcome
Plant volumee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant volume was increased by either mulching, high irrigation, incorporated peat moss or level beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High irrigation increased plant volume of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
high irrigatione1
Outcome
Plant volumee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant volume was increased by either mulching, high irrigation, incorporated peat moss or level beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated peat moss increased plant volume of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
incorporated peat mosse1
Outcome
Plant volumee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant volume was increased by either mulching, high irrigation, incorporated peat moss or level beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Level beds increased plant volume of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
level bedse1
Outcome
Plant volumee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant volume was increased by either mulching, high irrigation, incorporated peat moss or level beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation levels did not significantly affect fruit yield of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
irrigation levelse2
Outcome
Fruit yieldse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yields were not significantly affected by irrigation levels but were highest with either mulching, level beds or incorporated peat moss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave the highest fruit yield of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
mulchinge2
Outcome
Fruit yieldse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yields were not significantly affected by irrigation levels but were highest with either mulching, level beds or incorporated peat moss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Level beds gave the highest fruit yield of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
level bedse2
Outcome
Fruit yieldse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yields were not significantly affected by irrigation levels but were highest with either mulching, level beds or incorporated peat moss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated peat moss gave the highest fruit yield of southern highbush blueberry.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
incorporated peat mosse2
Outcome
Fruit yieldse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fruit yields were not significantly affected by irrigation levels but were highest with either mulching, level beds or incorporated peat moss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased yield more with level beds than with raised beds.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
mulchinge3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
with level bedse3
Comparator
raised bedse3

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e3

“The bed height X mulching interaction indicated that mulching increased yield more with level beds than with raised beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of mulching, level beds, incorporated peat moss and high irrigation yielded 1.1 kg per plant, about 10 times more than the comparator plants.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
the combination of mulching, level beds, incorporated peat moss, and high irrigation levelse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
approximately 10 times moree4
Value
1.1 kg per plante4
Comparator
plants grown without mulch, with raised beds, without peat moss, and with the low rates of irrigatione4

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plants grown with the combination of mulching, level beds, incorporated peat moss, and high irrigation levels yielded 1.1 kg per plant or approximately 10 times more than plants grown without mulch, with raised beds, without peat moss, and with the low rates of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching had the greatest influence on plant growth and fruiting among the four establishment practices.

Taxon
SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRYt0
Treatment
mulchinge5
Outcome
plant growth and fruitinge5
Comparator
4 establishment practicese5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“SOUTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–56 · show in text ↑
e5

“Of the 4 establishment practices evaluated, mulching had the greatest influence on plant growth and fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1173 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Results differ

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · growth · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

growing medium · yield · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.