Paper · 2015 · HortTechnology

Seasonal Water Use of Southern Highbush Blueberry Plants in a Subtropical Climate

Jeffrey G. Williamson; Luis Mejia; Bradley Ferguson; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nonweighing drainage lysimeters were used to measure seasonal water use of mature ‘Emerald’ southern highbush blueberry (SHB; Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrid) plants grown in pine bark beds and in pine bark amended soil in north central Florida. In the absence of rain, irrigation was applied daily with microsprinklers at ≈120% to 175% of reference evapotranspiration as either single or split applications. Leachate was collected and its volume determined from each lysimeter at 6- to 10-day intervals throughout the study. Water use, expressed as L/plant, was calculated as the difference between the amount of irrigation/rain added to lysimeters and the amount of leachate collected from lysimeters during each measurement period. Average daily water use was calculated for monthly intervals beginning in Apr. 2010 and ending in Sept. 2012. Water use increased rapidly during spring through the final stages of fruit ripening and harvest (May) with peak water use occurring during mid to late summer (July, August, and September). Plants grown in pine bark beds used more water than plants in pine bark amended soil during Apr., May, and Dec. 2010, Feb. 2011, and Mar. 2012, but there were no differences during the periods of highest water use. No differences in water use were observed between single or split-application irrigation treatments. Monthly averages for daily water use during the 30-month period ranged from ≈1.75 L/plant in January to ≈8.0 L/plant in mid to late summer. Mean monthly crop coefficient values during the 30-month period ranged from 0.44 in February to 0.86 in September. Canopy volume, yield, and mean berry weight were unaffected by soil or irrigation treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueberry water use rose rapidly in spring through harvest and peaked in mid to late summer.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Outcome
Water usee0
Direction
increased rapidlye0
Qualifier
spring through the final stages of fruit ripening and harvest (May)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Water use increased rapidly during spring through the final stages of fruit ripening and harvest (May) with peak water use occurring during mid to late summer (July, August, and September).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueberry plants in pine bark beds used more water than those in amended soil in the listed months.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Treatment
pine bark bedse0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
Apr., May, and Dec. 2010, Feb. 2011, and Mar. 2012e0
Comparator
pine bark amended soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown in pine bark beds used more water than plants in pine bark amended soil during Apr., May, and Dec. 2010, Feb. 2011, and Mar. 2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed and amended-soil plants did not differ in water use during peak-use periods.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Treatment
pine bark bedse1
Outcome
water usee1
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
pine bark amended soile1

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences during the periods of highest water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants grown in pine bark beds used more water than plants in pine bark amended soil during Apr., May, and Dec. 2010, Feb. 2011, and Mar. 2012, but there were no differences during the periods of highest water use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and split irrigation applications did not differ in blueberry water use.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Treatment
singlee0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
split-application irrigation treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in water use were observed between single or split-application irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly mean daily blueberry water use ranged from about 1.75 L/plant in January to about 8.0 L/plant in mid to late summer.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Outcome
daily water usee0
Value
≈1.75 L/plante0
Qualifier
Januarye0

Verbatim

e0

“Monthly averages for daily water use during the 30-month period ranged from ≈1.75 L/plant in January to ≈8.0 L/plant in mid to late summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily water use reached about 8.0 L/plant in mid to late summer.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Outcome
daily water usee0
Value
≈8.0 L/plante0
Qualifier
mid to late summere0

Verbatim

e0

“Monthly averages for daily water use during the 30-month period ranged from ≈1.75 L/plant in January to ≈8.0 L/plant in mid to late summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly mean crop coefficient was 0.44 in February.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Outcome
crop coefficiente0
Value
0.44e0
Qualifier
Februarye0

Verbatim

e0

“Mean monthly crop coefficient values during the 30-month period ranged from 0.44 in February to 0.86 in September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly mean crop coefficient was 0.86 in September.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Outcome
crop coefficiente0
Value
0.86e0
Qualifier
Septembere0

Verbatim

e0

“Mean monthly crop coefficient values during the 30-month period ranged from 0.44 in February to 0.86 in September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and irrigation treatments did not affect canopy volume, yield, or mean berry weight.

Taxon
Southern Highbush Blueberryt0
Treatment
soil or irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
Canopy volume, yield, and mean berry weighte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Canopy volume, yield, and mean berry weight were unaffected by soil or irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Southern Highbush Blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–49 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.