Paper · 2013 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Growth and phenolic compounds of Lactuca sativa L. grown in a closed‐type plant production system with UV‐A, ‐B, or ‐C lamp

Min‐Jeong Lee; Jung Eek Son; Myung‐Min Oh

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
127
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The production of high-quality crops based on phytochemicals is a strategy for accelerating the practical use of plant factories. Previous studies have demonstrated that ultraviolet (UV) light is effective in improving phytochemical production. This study aimed to determine the effect of various UV wavelengths on growth and phenolic compound accumulation in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system. RESULTS: Seven days, 1 day and 0.25 day were determined as the upper limit of the irradiation periods for UV-A, -B, and -C, respectively, in the lettuce based on physiological disorders and the fluorescence parameter F(v)/F(m). Continuous UV-A treatment significantly induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidants until 4 days of treatment without growth inhibition, consistent with an increase in phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene expression and PAL activity. Repeated or gradual UV-B exposure yielded approximately 1.4-3.6 times more total phenolics and antioxidants, respectively, than the controls did 2 days after the treatments, although both treatments inhibited lettuce growth. Repeated UV-C exposure increased phenolics but severely inhibited the growth of lettuce plants. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that UV irradiation can improve the accumulation of phenolic compounds with antioxidant properties in lettuce cultivated in plant factories.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous UV-A treatment significantly induced accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidants in lettuce until 4 days of treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Continuous UV-A treatmente1
Outcome
accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidantse1
Direction
inducede1
Qualifier
until 4 days of treatmente1
Setting
closed-type plant production systeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous UV-A treatment significantly induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidants until 4 days of treatment without growth inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous UV-A treatment did not inhibit lettuce growth up to 4 days of treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Continuous UV-A treatmente1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
without growth inhibitione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous UV-A treatment significantly induced the accumulation of phenolic compounds and antioxidants until 4 days of treatment without growth inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–831 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A treatment increased phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene expression and PAL activity in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)e2
Outcome
gene expression and PAL activitye2
Direction
increasee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e2

“consistent with an increase in phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene expression and PAL activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated or gradual UV-B exposure yielded about 1.4-3.6 times more total phenolics and antioxidants than controls 2 days after treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Repeated or gradual UV-B exposuree3
Outcome
total phenolics and antioxidantse3
Direction
moree3
Value
approximately 1.4-3.6 timese3
Qualifier
2 days after the treatmentse3
Comparator
the controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e3

“Repeated or gradual UV-B exposure yielded approximately 1.4-3.6 times more total phenolics and antioxidants, respectively, than the controls did 2 days after the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated or gradual UV-B exposure inhibited lettuce growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Repeated or gradual UV-B exposuree3
Outcome
lettuce growthe4
Direction
inhibitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e3

“Repeated or gradual UV-B exposure yielded approximately 1.4-3.6 times more total phenolics and antioxidants, respectively, than the controls did 2 days after the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1104 · show in text ↑
e4

“although both treatments inhibited lettuce growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated UV-C exposure increased phenolics in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Repeated UV-C exposuree5
Outcome
phenolicse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e5

“Repeated UV-C exposure increased phenolics but severely inhibited the growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated UV-C exposure severely inhibited the growth of lettuce plants.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Repeated UV-C exposuree5
Outcome
growth of lettuce plantse5
Direction
severely inhibitede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in a closed-type plant production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–446 · show in text ↑
e5

“Repeated UV-C exposure increased phenolics but severely inhibited the growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1251 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper limits of irradiation periods in lettuce were 7 days for UV-A, 1 day for UV-B and 0.25 day for UV-C.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae6
Outcome
upper limit of the irradiation periodse6
Value
Seven days, 1 day and 0.25 daye6
Qualifier
based on physiological disorders and the fluorescence parameter F(v)/F(m)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Seven days, 1 day and 0.25 day were determined as the upper limit of the irradiation periods for UV-A, -B, and -C, respectively, in the lettuce based on physiological disorders and the fluorescence parameter F(v)/F(m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–674 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

uv · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

35 papers: 15 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.