uv · Growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)
66 claims from these papers; 33 citations between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- EFFECT OF SOLAR UV RADIATION ON ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES AND PHENOLS BIOSYNTHESIS IN LETTUCE (Lactuca sativa) (2015)
decreaseSolar UV radiation significantly decreased lettuce seedling fresh weight.
Effect on the Growth and Nutritional Components in Two Red Lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) Cultivated Under UV Light in a Mini Plant Factory (2019)no changeUV radiation incorporation had no effect on fresh weight, leaf area or leaf thickness of red lettuce.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - UVA Radiation Is Beneficial for Yield and Quality of Indoor Cultivated Lettuce (2019)
increaseUVA-10 increased shoot dry weight by 27% versus no UVA.
Effects of Supplemental UV-A LEDs on the Nutritional Quality of Lettuce: Accumulation of Protein and Other Essential Nutrients (2022)decreaseSix-day UV-A decreased shoot dry mass versus control.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Influences of UV Radiation on Growth and Nutritional Quality of Three Leaf-color Lettuce Cultivars (2014)
decreaseshoot fresh weight in green lettuce was significantly decreased under UV radiation.
Effect on the Growth and Nutritional Components in Two Red Lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) Cultivated Under UV Light in a Mini Plant Factory (2019)no changeUV radiation incorporation had no effect on fresh weight, leaf area or leaf thickness of red lettuce.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
33 citations between these papers: 18 on the same side, 15 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 15
Influence of Ambient UV Radiation on Growth and Flavonoid Concentration of `New Red Fire' Lettuce · 1997
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
UV SUPPLEMENTATION FOR GROWTH REGULATION AND DISEASE CONTROL · 2006
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
UVA Radiation Is Beneficial for Yield and Quality of Indoor Cultivated Lettuce · 2019
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Fuzzy Logic-Based Hydroponic Vertical Farming System Using UVC for Pathogen and Pest Control · 2025
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 20
- no effect
Factors Affecting the Survival of Bremia lactucae Sporangia Deposited on Lettuce Leaves · 2000
- no effect
- negative
Ultraviolet Radiation as a Limiting Factor in Leaf Expansion and Development · 2008
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Influences of UV Radiation on Growth and Nutritional Quality of Three Leaf-color Lettuce Cultivars · 2014
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Changes in Growth and Antioxidant Contents of Romaine Lettuce by Different UV Spectra · 2018
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
Destructive effect of UV-C light radiation on lettuce growth: risk assessment of long time exposure · 2024
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.