Paper · 2011 · Physiologia Plantarum

Ecological responses to UV radiation: interactions between the biological effects of UV on plants and on associated organisms

Nigel D. Paul; Jason P. Moore; Martin McPherson; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
74
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Solar ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation (280-315 nm) has a wide range of effects on terrestrial ecosystems, yet our understanding of how UV-B influences the complex interactions of plants with pest, pathogen and related microorganisms remains limited. Here, we report the results of a series of experiments in Lactuca sativa which aimed to characterize not only key plant responses to UV radiation in a field environment but also consequential effects for plant interactions with a sap-feeding insect, two model plant pathogens and phylloplane microorganism populations. Three spectrally modifying filters with contrasting UV transmissions were used to filter ambient sunlight, and when compared with our UV-inclusive filter, L. sativa plants grown in a zero UV-B environment showed significantly increased shoot fresh weight, reduced foliar pigment concentrations and suppressed population growth of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae). Plants grown under a filter which allowed partial transmission of UV-A radiation and negligible UV-B transmission showed increased density of leaf surface phylloplane microbes compared with the UV-inclusive treatment. Effects of UV treatment on the severity of two plant pathogens, Bremia lactucae and Botrytis cinerea, were complex as both the UV-inclusive and zero UV-B filters reduced the severity of pathogen persistence. These results are discussed with reference to known spectral responses of plants, insects and microorganisms, and contrasted with established fundamental responses of plants and other organisms to solar UV radiation, with particular emphasis on the need for future integration between different experimental approaches when investigating the effects of solar UV radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce plants grown under zero UV-B had significantly higher shoot fresh weight than under the UV-inclusive filter.

Taxon
L. sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
zero UV-B environmente0
Outcome
shoot fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
UV-inclusive filtere0
Setting
zero UV-B environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when compared with our UV-inclusive filter, L. sativa plants grown in a zero UV-B environment showed significantly increased shoot fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce plants grown under zero UV-B had significantly lower foliar pigment concentrations than under the UV-inclusive filter.

Taxon
L. sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
zero UV-B environmente0
Outcome
foliar pigment concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
UV-inclusive filtere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. sativa plants grown in a zero UV-B environment showed significantly increased shoot fresh weight, reduced foliar pigment concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“when compared with our UV-inclusive filter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero UV-B suppressed population growth of green peach aphid on lettuce compared with the UV-inclusive filter.

Taxon
L. sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
zero UV-B environmente0
Interactor
green peach aphid (Myzus persicae)Myzus persicaee0pest
Outcome
population growth of green peach aphide0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
UV-inclusive filtere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Myzus persicae
Myzus persicae · InteractorScott Bauer · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. sativa plants grown in a zero UV-B environment showed significantly increased shoot fresh weight, reduced foliar pigment concentrations and suppressed population growth of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“when compared with our UV-inclusive filter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants under a filter with partial UV-A and negligible UV-B transmission had higher density of leaf surface phylloplane microbes than under the UV-inclusive treatment.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
filter which allowed partial transmission of UV-A radiation and negligible UV-B transmissione1
Outcome
density of leaf surface phylloplane microbese1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
UV-inclusive treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–319 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants grown under a filter which allowed partial transmission of UV-A radiation and negligible UV-B transmission showed increased density of leaf surface phylloplane microbes compared with the UV-inclusive treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects of UV treatment on the severity of Bremia lactucae and Botrytis cinerea were complex: both the UV-inclusive and zero UV-B filters reduced pathogen persistence severity.

Taxon
Lactuca sativaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
UV treatmente1
Interactor
Bremia lactucaeBremia lactucaee1pathogen
Second interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
severity of pathogen persistencee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bremia lactucae
Bremia lactucae · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lactuca sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–319 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effects of UV treatment on the severity of two plant pathogens, Bremia lactucae and Botrytis cinerea, were complex as both the UV-inclusive and zero UV-B filters reduced the severity of pathogen persistence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1356 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

35 papers: 15 positive, 20 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

uv · Myzus persicae · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

climate site · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.