Paper · 2014 · Annual Research & Review in Biology

Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation and Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Performance of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. Romaine) Plants

Jalal Basahi

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
34
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present study was to investigate some biochemical changes in field grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv Romaine) plants in terms of importance of the accumulation of anthocyanins, flavonoids and photosynthetic pigments as well as photosynthetic limitations which changed during exposure of plants to drought stress and UV-B radiation in order to circumvent the deleterious effects of these Stresses. Place and Duration of Study: The experiment was conducted under filed conditions from November 2012 to January 2013, at the Agricultural Research Center, KAU. Methodology: The experimental design was a factorial arrangement in randomized complete blocks with four replicates. The first factor was UV-B (300 nm). The second factor was irrigation regime (complete irrigation to field capacity and limited irrigation. Gas exchange measurements were carried out using a LI-6200 portable IRGA. Chlorophyll fluorescence of Fv/Fm was measured by PAM 2000 fluorometer. Biochemical analyses and antioxidant enzymes assays were performed according to the appropriate methods. Results: Exposure of lettuce plants to enhanced UV-B radiation and drought stresses (DS) negatively and significantly affected the process of photosynthesis including CO2 assimilation (PN), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) and transpiration rate (E). However, the amplitude of the effects of both stressors was dependent on the interactions. This resulted in alleviation of the negative effect of drought on photosynthesis and transpiration by UV-B radiation as the water stress intensified. Intercellular CO2 (Ci) concentration was only reduced due to water stress compared to control plants. The maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was not affected by UV-B radiation stress but reduced by drought. There was an increase in the activities of some antioxidant due to both stresses when applied singly and in combination UV-B irradiation increased the contents of the UV-B absorbing compounds (carotenoids, soluble phenols, anthocyanins), while drought stress caused a notable increase in free proline content. Increase in content of Proline may be the drought-induced factor which plays a protective role in response to UV-B. Conclusion: UV-B radiation provoked in general more severe damage, evaluated as changes in the amounts of stress markers, than DS, when applied separately. Under multiple stress conditions, each of the stress factors seems to bring out some adaptive effects to reduce the damage experienced by plants caused by the other one. DS can induce accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds (flavonoids, carotenoids and soluble phenols), which is likely to offer some increased protection from UV-B.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B and drought significantly reduced CO2 assimilation, conductance and transpiration.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiation and drought stresses (DS)e0
Outcome
CO2 assimilation (PN), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposure of lettuce plants to enhanced UV-B radiation and drought stresses (DS) negatively and significantly affected the process of photosynthesis including CO2 assimilation (PN), stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) and transpiration rate (E).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1345 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two stresses interacted in their effect amplitude.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
both stressorse0
Outcome
amplitude of the effectse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amplitude of the effects of both stressors was dependent on the interactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B alleviated drought effects on photosynthesis and transpiration as water stress intensified.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
photosynthesis and transpiratione0
Direction
alleviatione0
Comparator
droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in alleviation of the negative effect of drought on photosynthesis and transpiration by UV-B radiation as the water stress intensified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress alone reduced intercellular CO2 compared with controls.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
Intercellular CO2 (Ci) concentratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercellular CO2 (Ci) concentration was only reduced due to water stress compared to control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1688 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B did not affect maximum photosystem II efficiency.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UV-B radiation stresse0
Outcome
maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was not affected by UV-B radiation stress but reduced by drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced maximum photosystem II efficiency.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was not affected by UV-B radiation stress but reduced by drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1803 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each stress alone and both together increased some antioxidant activities.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
both stresses when applied singly and in combinatione0
Outcome
activities of some antioxidante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in the activities of some antioxidant due to both stresses when applied singly and in combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1804–1923 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B increased carotenoids, soluble phenols and anthocyanins.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione0
Outcome
contents of the UV-B absorbing compounds (carotenoids, soluble phenols, anthocyanins)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B irradiation increased the contents of the UV-B absorbing compounds (carotenoids, soluble phenols, anthocyanins)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2040 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased free proline.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
free proline contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress caused a notable increase in free proline content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2048–2113 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline may protect lettuce against UV-B under drought.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Compound
Prolinee0
Outcome
protective role in response to UV-Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in content of Proline may be the drought-induced factor which plays a protective role in response to UV-B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2114–2229 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B separately caused more severe stress marker damage than drought.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
damagee0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-B radiation provoked in general more severe damage, evaluated as changes in the amounts of stress markers, than DS, when applied separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2242–2385 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought can induce UV-B absorbing compounds that may protect against UV-B.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
increased protection from UV-Be0
Qualifier
accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds (flavonoids, carotenoids and soluble phenols)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DS can induce accumulation of UV-B absorbing compounds (flavonoids, carotenoids and soluble phenols), which is likely to offer some increased protection from UV-B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2556–2719 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1121 · show in text ↑

uv · pest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.