Paper · 2021 · Horticulturae

Effect of Drought Stress on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters, Phytochemical Contents, and Antioxidant Activities in Lettuce Seedlings

Yu Kyeong Shin; Shiva Ram Bhandari; Jung Su Jo; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
158
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study monitored changes in chlorophyll fluorescence (CF), growth parameters, soil moisture content, phytochemical content (proline, ascorbic acid, chlorophyll, total phenol content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC)), and antioxidant activities in 12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments in controlled conditions for eight days. Measurements occurred at two-day intervals. Among ten CF parameters studied, effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PSII (Y(PSII)), coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP), and coefficient of photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence based on the lake model of PSII (qL) significantly decreased in drought-stressed seedlings from day 6 of treatment compared to control. In contrast, maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), ratio of fluorescence (Rfd), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII (Y(NO)) were significantly affected only at the end. All growth parameters decreased in drought-stressed seedlings compared to control. Proline started increasing from day 4 and showed ~660-fold elevation on day 8 compared to control. Chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activities decreased in drought-stressed seedlings. Results showed major changes in all parameters in seedlings under prolonged drought stress. These findings clarify effects of drought stress in lettuce seedlings during progressive drought exposure and will be useful in the seedling industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Y(PSII), qP and qL significantly decreased in drought-stressed lettuce seedlings from day 6 compared with control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PSII (Y(PSII)), coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP), and coefficient of photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence based on the lake model of PSII (qL)e1
Direction
significantly decreasede1
Qualifier
from day 6 of treatmente1
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“effective quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PSII (Y(PSII)), coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP), and coefficient of photochemical quenching of variable fluorescence based on the lake model of PSII (qL) significantly decreased in drought-stressed seedlings from day 6 of treatment compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm, Rfd and Y(NO) were significantly affected by drought only at the end of the treatment.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), ratio of fluorescence (Rfd), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII (Y(NO))e2
Qualifier
only at the ende2
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast, maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm), ratio of fluorescence (Rfd), and quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation in PSII (Y(NO)) were significantly affected only at the end”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All growth parameters decreased in drought-stressed lettuce seedlings compared with control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
growth parameterse3
Direction
decreasede3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e3

“All growth parameters decreased in drought-stressed seedlings compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased from day 4 and reached about 660-fold elevation on day 8 compared with control in drought-stressed lettuce seedlings.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Prolinee4
Direction
increasinge4
Value
~660-folde4
Qualifier
from day 4e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e4

“Proline started increasing from day 4 and showed ~660-fold elevation on day 8 compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll, ascorbic acid and TPC decreased in drought-stressed lettuce seedlings.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, TPCe5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e5

“Chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activities decreased in drought-stressed seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TFC and antioxidant activities decreased in drought-stressed lettuce seedlings.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
TFC, and antioxidant activitiese5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12-day-old lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings grown under drought stress (no irrigation) and control (well irrigated) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–390 · show in text ↑
e5

“Chlorophyll, ascorbic acid, TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activities decreased in drought-stressed seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1310 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.