Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Combined Spirulina and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Enhance Drought Tolerance in Lettuce, with Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Excelling Under Severe Stress

Seyedeh Batool Hassani; Mojgan Latifi; Zahra Akbar-Tajari; et al.

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress hinders plant growth by reducing water availability, leading to stunted plants growth, lower photosynthesis rates, and decreased yields. This research explored the impact of the combination of Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria on the growth and resilience of lettuce plants under three drought levels (80%, 60%, and 40%). Overall, drought reduced germination percentages, but at 40% level, Spirulina significantly improved germination rates. At higher drought levels, Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria positively influenced germination compared to the control, with SRB showing the most pronounced effect. Root growth increased significantly under 60% drought, though no root elongation under different stress levels was impacted. Leaf area decreased with increasing drought, but sulfate-reducing bacteria significantly enhanced it, especially at 80% drought. Control plants’ relative water content decreased with increasing drought severity. However, the combination of Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria at 60% drought mitigated this effect. Notably, under 60% and 80% drought, hydrogen peroxide levels increased, though the Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria combined consistently elevated hydrogen peroxide levels in both 60% and 80% conditions. Superoxide dismutase activity rose by 80% in non-treated plants, while Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria individually enhanced superoxide dismutase activity across moderate and high drought. Catalase activity decreased at 80% drought in control plants; however, an increase was observed with sulfate-reducing bacteria in 80% stress level. The Fv/Fm ratio and PiABS declined as drought intensified, but sulfate-reducing bacteria improved these parameters at both 60% and 80% stress levels. ABS/RC and ET0/RC ratios responded positively to sulfate-reducing bacteria under severe drought. These findings suggest that while Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria enhance drought tolerance in lettuce, sulfate-reducing bacteria are especially effective under higher drought stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced lettuce germination percentages.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
germination percentagese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, drought reduced germination percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spirulina improved lettuce germination at 40% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Spirulinae0
Interactor
Spirulinae0symbiont
Outcome
germination ratese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
40% levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 40% level, Spirulina significantly improved germination rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spirulina increased germination at higher drought levels relative to control.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Spirulinae0
Interactor
Spirulinae0symbiont
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
positively influencede0
Qualifier
higher drought levelse0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher drought levels, Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria positively influenced germination compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate-reducing bacteria increased germination at higher drought levels relative to control, with the strongest effect.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
positively influencede0
Qualifier
most pronounced effecte0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher drought levels, Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria positively influenced germination compared to the control, with SRB showing the most pronounced effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth increased significantly under 60% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
60% droughte0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth increased significantly under 60% drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root elongation was unaffected across stress levels.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
different stress levelse0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
no root elongation under different stress levels was impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no root elongation under different stress levels was impacted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area decreased as drought increased.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area decreased with increasing drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate-reducing bacteria enhanced leaf area, especially at 80% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Leaf areae1
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
especially at 80% droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfate-reducing bacteria significantly enhanced it, especially at 80% drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf area decreased with increasing drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had lower relative water content as drought severity increased.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
drought severitye0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control plants’ relative water content decreased with increasing drought severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria mitigated the water-content decline at 60% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
the combination of Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
Spirulinae0symbiont
Second interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
relative water contente1
Direction
mitigatede0
Qualifier
60% droughte0
Comparator
Control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria at 60% drought mitigated this effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control plants’ relative water content decreased with increasing drought severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide levels increased under 60% and 80% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
60% and 80% droughte0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under 60% and 80% drought, hydrogen peroxide levels increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria elevated hydrogen peroxide at 60% and 80% drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria combinede0
Interactor
Spirulinae0symbiont
Second interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide levelse0
Direction
elevatede0
Qualifier
60% and 80% conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria combined consistently elevated hydrogen peroxide levels in both 60% and 80% conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Superoxide dismutase activity rose by 80% in non-treated plants.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
rosee0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Superoxide dismutase activity rose by 80% in non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spirulina enhanced superoxide dismutase activity across moderate and high drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Spirulinae0
Interactor
Spirulinae0symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
moderate and high droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria individually enhanced superoxide dismutase activity across moderate and high drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate-reducing bacteria enhanced superoxide dismutase activity across moderate and high drought.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
moderate and high droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spirulina and sulfate-reducing bacteria individually enhanced superoxide dismutase activity across moderate and high drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity decreased at 80% drought in controls.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
80% droughte0
Outcome
Catalase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
control plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Catalase activity decreased at 80% drought in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate-reducing bacteria increased catalase activity at 80% stress.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Catalase activitye1
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
80% stress levele0
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase was observed with sulfate-reducing bacteria in 80% stress level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1630 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catalase activity decreased at 80% drought in control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm ratio and PiABS declined as drought intensified.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratio and PiABSe0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fv/Fm ratio and PiABS declined as drought intensified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate-reducing bacteria improved Fv/Fm ratio and PiABS at 60% and 80% stress.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratio and PiABSe1
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
60% and 80% stress levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfate-reducing bacteria improved these parameters at both 60% and 80% stress levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1780 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Fv/Fm ratio and PiABS declined as drought intensified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, sulfate-reducing bacteria positively affected ABS/RC and ET0/RC ratios.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0
Interactor
sulfate-reducing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
ABS/RC and ET0/RC ratiose0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
severe droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABS/RC and ET0/RC ratios responded positively to sulfate-reducing bacteria under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–85 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 97 positive, 14 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.