Paper · 2018 · Journal of people, plants, and environment

Changes in Growth and Antioxidant Contents of Romaine Lettuce by Different UV Spectra

Sung Woo Jeong

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The current study was conducted to determine the influence of irradiations of different UV spectra on plant growth and antioxidant compounds of two romaine lettuce cultivars('Caesar green' and 'Caesar red'). The UV treatments were consisted of three UV spectra; UV-A (314-400nm), FUV-B (290-400nm) and UV-B (274-400nm), using fluorescent lamps and irradiated for 2 hours at nighttime for 11 days under greenhouse. As the results, there were no differences in growth parameters and antioxidant compounds between UV-A treatments and control in two cultivars. On the other hand, FUV-B treatment increased significantly the contents of UV absorbing compounds, -carotene, lutein, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in caesar green cultivar. It also increased UV absorbing compounds, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin contents in caesar red cultivar without any growth reduction. UV-B treatment, however, decreased lutein, chlorophyll contents and caused growth reduction and physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinkle in both cultivars. Overall, the results indicate that supplemental FUV-B treatment, at least in part, may increase antioxidant compounds without any inhibitory effect on shoot growth in romaine lettuce. The results of the current study present a useful practical technique for increasing antioxidant compounds of romaine lettuce production in greenhouse horticulture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A treatment did not change growth parameters or antioxidant compounds of romaine lettuce relative to control in two cultivars.

Material
two romaine lettuce cultivarse0
Treatment
UV-Ae1
Outcome
growth parameters and antioxidant compoundse1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
greenhousee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“two romaine lettuce cultivars('Caesar green' and 'Caesar red')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–206 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no differences in growth parameters and antioxidant compounds between UV-A treatments and control in two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–555 · show in text ↑
e6

“irradiated for 2 hours at nighttime for 11 days under greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FUV-B treatment significantly increased UV absorbing compounds, beta-carotene and lutein in Caesar green.

Material
caesar greene2
Treatment
FUV-B treatmente2
Outcome
UV absorbing compounds, -carotene, luteine2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“two romaine lettuce cultivars('Caesar green' and 'Caesar red')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–206 · show in text ↑
e2

“FUV-B treatment increased significantly the contents of UV absorbing compounds, -carotene, lutein, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in caesar green cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FUV-B treatment significantly increased total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in Caesar green.

Material
caesar greene2
Treatment
FUV-B treatmente2
Outcome
total phenolic compounds and anthocyanine2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“two romaine lettuce cultivars('Caesar green' and 'Caesar red')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–206 · show in text ↑
e2

“FUV-B treatment increased significantly the contents of UV absorbing compounds, -carotene, lutein, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in caesar green cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FUV-B treatment increased UV absorbing compounds, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in Caesar red without any growth reduction.

Material
caesar rede3
Treatment
FUV-Be2
Outcome
UV absorbing compounds, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin contentse3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
without any growth reductione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e2

“FUV-B treatment increased significantly the contents of UV absorbing compounds, -carotene, lutein, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin in caesar green cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–740 · show in text ↑
e3

“It also increased UV absorbing compounds, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin contents in caesar red cultivar without any growth reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treatment decreased lutein and chlorophyll contents of romaine lettuce in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse4
Treatment
UV-B treatmente4
Outcome
lutein, chlorophyll contentse4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e4

“UV-B treatment, however, decreased lutein, chlorophyll contents and caused growth reduction and physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinkle in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treatment caused growth reduction of romaine lettuce in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse4
Treatment
UV-B treatmente4
Outcome
growthe4
Direction
reductione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e4

“UV-B treatment, however, decreased lutein, chlorophyll contents and caused growth reduction and physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinkle in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B treatment caused physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinkle in romaine lettuce in both cultivars.

Material
both cultivarse4
Treatment
UV-B treatmente4
Outcome
physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinklee4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e4

“UV-B treatment, however, decreased lutein, chlorophyll contents and caused growth reduction and physiological damage such as leaf chlorosis and wrinkle in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1056 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental FUV-B is a useful practical technique for increasing antioxidant compounds of greenhouse romaine lettuce production.

Outcome
a useful practical technique for increasing antioxidant compoundse5
Setting
greenhouse horticulturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa var. longifolia
Lactuca sativa var. longifolia · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Romaine Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–61 · show in text ↑
e5

“a useful practical technique for increasing antioxidant compounds of romaine lettuce production in greenhouse horticulture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1405 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

35 papers: 15 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

uv · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.