Paper · 1994 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Element absorption by sorghum root tips as influenced by multiple ion‐channel and ion‐pump inhibitors

R. E. Wilkinson; R. R. Duncan; C. Berry

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Mineral nutrient absorption by 1‐cm root tips of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. cv GP‐10, SC283, SC574, and/or Funk GS22DR from a 1‐hr exposure to Hoagland and Arnon complete mineral nutrient solution in the presence of diltiazem (0,10 mM), nifedipine (0,10 mM), or SITS (0, 1 mM) was evaluated using inductively coupled plasma emission photometry (ICP). Calcium (Ca2+) ‐ channel blockers (i.e. ‐ diltiazem, nifedipine, and verapamil) and PCMBS induced significantly decreased quantities of Ca2+ in root tips but the anion channel blocker, SITS, did not induce any response in Ca2+ uptake. Responses of phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), boron (B), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), and copper (Cu) to all of the ion uptake modifiers were highly variable between the cultivars with increased, decreased, or no influence on ion uptake. As yet unrecognized multiple mechanisms of ion uptake through the root plasma membrane are necessary to explain the date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium channel blockers and PCMBS significantly reduced calcium quantities in sorghum root tips.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
root tipse0
Treatment
Calcium (Ca2+) ‐ channel blockerse0
Outcome
quantities of Ca2+ in root tipse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Calcium (Ca2+) ‐ channel blockers (i.e. ‐ diltiazem, nifedipine, and verapamil) and PCMBS induced significantly decreased quantities of Ca2+ in root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SITS did not change calcium uptake in sorghum root tips.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
SITSe0
Outcome
Ca2+ uptakee0
Direction
did not induce any responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“the anion channel blocker, SITS, did not induce any response in Ca2+ uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses of phosphorus, zinc and boron uptake to modifiers varied among sorghum cultivars, including increases, decreases and no influence.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
ion uptake modifierse0
Outcome
phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), boron (B)e0
Direction
increased, decreased, or no influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Responses of phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), boron (B), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), and copper (Cu) to all of the ion uptake modifiers were highly variable between the cultivars with increased, decreased, or no influence on ion uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses of manganese, iron and magnesium uptake to modifiers varied among sorghum cultivars, including increases, decreases and no influence.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
ion uptake modifierse0
Outcome
manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg)e0
Direction
increased, decreased, or no influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“Responses of phosphorus (P), zinc (Zn), boron (B), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), and copper (Cu) to all of the ion uptake modifiers were highly variable between the cultivars with increased, decreased, or no influence on ion uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper uptake response to modifiers varied among sorghum cultivars, including increases, decreases and no influence.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
ion uptake modifierse0
Outcome
copper (Cu)e0
Direction
increased, decreased, or no influencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“copper (Cu) to all of the ion uptake modifiers were highly variable between the cultivars with increased, decreased, or no influence on ion uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–842 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variable uptake responses suggest multiple mechanisms of ion transport through the root plasma membrane.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
ion uptake through the root plasma membranee0
Qualifier
multiple mechanismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–39 · show in text ↑
e0

“As yet unrecognized multiple mechanisms of ion uptake through the root plasma membrane are necessary to explain the date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–964 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.