Paper · 2004 · Scientia Agricola

Silicon sources for rice crop

Hamilton Seron Pereira; Gaspar Henrique Korndörfer; Anelisa de Aquino Vidal; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
113
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although silicon is not an essential nutrient, its application is beneficial for plant growth and development. To evaluate silicon sources in relation to agronomic efficiency and economic viability in rice crops (Oryza sativa L.), a greenhouse experiment was conducted, Quartzipsamment soil, in a completely randomized experimental design (n = 4). Treatments were 12 silicon sources and a control. Silicon was applied at the rate of 125 kg Si ha-1. Data were compared to a standard response curve for Si using the standard source Wollastonite at rates of 0, 125, 250, 375, and 500 kg Si ha-1. All treatments received CaCO3 and MgCO3 to balance pH, Ca and Mg. One hundred and fifty days after sowing, evaluations on dry matter yield in the above-ground part of plants, grain yield, and Si contents in the soil and plant tissues were performed. Wollastonite had linear response, increasing silicon in the soil and plants with increasing application rates. Differences between silicon sources in relation to Si uptake were observed. Phosphate slag provided the highest Si uptake, followed by Wollastonite and electric furnace silicates which however, did not show differed among themselves. The highest Si accumulation in grain was observed for stainless steel, which significantly differed from the control, silicate clay, Wollastonite, and AF2 (blast furnace of the company 2) slag. Silicate clay showed the lowest Si accumulation in grain and did not differ from the control, AF2 slag, AF1 slag, schist ash, schist, and LD4 (furnace steel type LD of the company 4) slag.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite increased soil and plant silicon with application rate.

Treatment
Wollastonitee0
Outcome
silicon in the soil and plantse0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
application ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wollastonite had linear response, increasing silicon in the soil and plants with increasing application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice silicon uptake differed among silicon sources.

Treatment
silicon sourcese0
Outcome
Si uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between silicon sources in relation to Si uptake were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate slag yielded the highest silicon uptake.

Treatment
Phosphate slage0
Outcome
Si uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Wollastonite and electric furnace silicatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate slag provided the highest Si uptake, followed by Wollastonite and electric furnace silicates which however, did not show differed among themselves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite and electric furnace silicates did not differ in silicon uptake.

Material
Wollastonitee0
Outcome
Si uptakee0
Direction
did not show differede0
Comparator
electric furnace silicatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate slag provided the highest Si uptake, followed by Wollastonite and electric furnace silicates which however, did not show differed among themselves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stainless steel gave the highest grain silicon accumulation, significantly differing from four sources.

Treatment
stainless steele0
Outcome
Si accumulation in graine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the control, silicate clay, Wollastonite, and AF2 (blast furnace of the company 2) slage0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest Si accumulation in grain was observed for stainless steel, which significantly differed from the control, silicate clay, Wollastonite, and AF2 (blast furnace of the company 2) slag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate clay produced the lowest grain silicon accumulation.

Treatment
Silicate claye0
Outcome
Si accumulation in graine0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
the control, AF2 slag, AF1 slag, schist ash, schist, and LD4 (furnace steel type LD of the company 4) slage0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicate clay showed the lowest Si accumulation in grain and did not differ from the control, AF2 slag, AF1 slag, schist ash, schist, and LD4 (furnace steel type LD of the company 4) slag”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1569 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Wollastonite · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 142 positive, 26 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.