Paper · 2017 · Plants

Effect of Different Silicon Sources on Yield and Silicon Uptake of Rice Grown under Varying Phosphorus Rates

Flavia Agostinho; Brenda Tubana; Murilo Martins; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
87
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A series of pot experiments were conducted to: (1) evaluate the effects of different Si sources (soil- and foliar-applied) on grain yield and Si accumulation of rice supplied with varying P rates, and (2) evaluate Si absorption of rice using foliar- and soil-applied Si fertilizers. Three P rates, (0, 112, and 224 kg ha−1) combined with five Si treatments (wollastonite and slag applied at 4.5 ton ha−1 and one foliar Si solution applied at 20, 40 and 80 mg Si L−1) and a check were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The presence of P and Si in the soil created a synergistic effect on soil Al, Mn, and As (P < 0.01), but not on rice growth and P uptake. Wollastonite and slag application were most effective in raising rice Si content than foliar applied Si (P < 0.001). While there was an improvement in biomass (42%) and tiller production (25%) for rice receiving foliar Si, no supporting evidence was obtained in these experiments to verify leaf surface Si absorption. The application of Si-rich materials to soil still remains the most effective method for enhancing Si uptake by plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of P and Si in the soil had a synergistic effect on soil Al, Mn and As (P < 0.01).

Treatment
P and Si in the soile1
Outcome
soil Al, Mn, and Ase1
Direction
synergistic effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silicon Uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“The presence of P and Si in the soil created a synergistic effect on soil Al, Mn, and As (P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of P and Si in the soil did not have a synergistic effect on rice growth and P uptake.

Treatment
P and Si in the soile1
Outcome
rice growth and P uptakee1
Direction
not one1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The presence of P and Si in the soil created a synergistic effect on soil Al, Mn, and As (P < 0.01), but not on rice growth and P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wollastonite and slag application were more effective than foliar-applied Si in raising rice Si content (P < 0.001).

Treatment
Wollastonite and slag applicatione1
Outcome
rice Si contente1
Direction
most effective in raisinge1
Comparator
foliar applied Sie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Wollastonite and slag application were most effective in raising rice Si content than foliar applied Si (P < 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice receiving foliar Si had a 42% improvement in biomass.

Treatment
foliar Sie1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
42%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While there was an improvement in biomass (42%) and tiller production (25%) for rice receiving foliar Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice receiving foliar Si had a 25% improvement in tiller production.

Treatment
foliar Sie1
Outcome
tiller productione1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
25%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While there was an improvement in biomass (42%) and tiller production (25%) for rice receiving foliar Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–914 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No supporting evidence was obtained in these experiments to verify leaf surface Si absorption.

Outcome
leaf surface Si absorptione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Silicon Uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“no supporting evidence was obtained in these experiments to verify leaf surface Si absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1009 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that applying Si-rich materials to soil remains the most effective method for enhancing Si uptake by plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee1
Outcome
most effective method for enhancing Si uptakee1

Verbatim

e1

“The application of Si-rich materials to soil still remains the most effective method for enhancing Si uptake by plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1129 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

218 papers: 202 positive, 16 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

214 papers more in this group

See all 218 papers →

Wollastonite · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

309 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.