Paper · 1996 · Journal of Applied Bacteriology

Bioassay methods for the detection of antifungal activity by Pseudomonas antimicrobica against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinerea

R. Walker; K.A. Emslie; E.J. Allan

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Antagonism against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinerea by Pseudomonas antimicrobica was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Cell-free filtrates showed activity against B. cinerea growing on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) in a media-dependent manner with the most distinct antagonism being produced in Czapek Dox Broth (CDB). Cell-free filtrates of CDB-grown cultures also significantly reduced conidial germination of B. cinerea. An assay based on the inhibition of conidial germination was compared with two assays measuring the antagonism of mycelial growth on PDA. The conidial germination bioassay was more sensitive in the detection of this antifungal activity than the Petri dish bioassay while a bioassay using Microdetection plates did not detect antagonism due to the small loading capacity of the latter. The conidial germination bioassay was modified for detection of antibiosis on the surface of strawberry leaves. Significant reductions in percentage conidial germination were recorded on the surface of leaves of both micropropagated and glasshouse grown strawberry plants when the antifungal compounds of Ps. antimicrobica were applied to the leaf tissue with the conidia. In addition, antifungal compounds were also detectable when conidia were applied to leaf tissue which had previously been sprayed with cells of Ps. antimicrobica. These tests indicate that Ps. antimicrobica would be a suitable biocontrol agent for the control of B. cinerea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas antagonized Botrytis in vitro and in vivo.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas antimicrobicaBurkholderia gladiolie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Antagonism against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinereae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia gladioli
Burkholderia gladioli · Second interactor英语維基百科 的 Melww · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonism against the grey mould pathogen Botrytis cinerea by Pseudomonas antimicrobica was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell-free filtrates antagonized Botrytis on PDA, most clearly when grown in CDB.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Cell-free filtratese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
activity against B. cinereae0
Direction
most distinct antagonisme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell-free filtrates showed activity against B. cinerea growing on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) in a media-dependent manner with the most distinct antagonism being produced in Czapek Dox Broth (CDB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–323 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CDB-grown cell-free filtrates significantly reduced Botrytis conidial germination.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
Cell-free filtrates of CDB-grown culturese0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
conidial germination of B. cinereae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cell-free filtrates of CDB-grown cultures also significantly reduced conidial germination of B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–428 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conidial germination bioassay was more sensitive than Petri dish assay.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
sensitive in the detection of this antifungal activitye0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
Petri dish bioassaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conidial germination bioassay was more sensitive in the detection of this antifungal activity than the Petri dish bioassay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–694 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microdetection plate bioassay did not detect antagonism because of small loading capacity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Outcome
did not detect antagonisme0
Qualifier
small loading capacitye0
Comparator
Microdetection platese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a bioassay using Microdetection plates did not detect antagonism due to the small loading capacity of the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–813 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied antifungal compounds significantly reduced Botrytis conidial germination on strawberry leaves.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
antifungal compounds of Ps. antimicrobicae0
Interactor
conidiae0pathogen
Second interactor
Ps. antimicrobicae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage conidial germinatione0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reductions in percentage conidial germination were recorded on the surface of leaves of both micropropagated and glasshouse grown strawberry plants when the antifungal compounds of Ps. antimicrobica were applied to the leaf tissue with the conidia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antifungal compounds remained detectable when conidia were applied after leaf spraying with Pseudomonas cells.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
sprayed with cells of Ps. antimicrobicae0
Interactor
Ps. antimicrobicae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antifungal compounds were also detectablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antifungal compounds were also detectable when conidia were applied to leaf tissue which had previously been sprayed with cells of Ps. antimicrobica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors judged Pseudomonas suitable for Botrytis biocontrol.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Ps. antimicrobicae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of B. cinereae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ps. antimicrobica would be a suitable biocontrol agent for the control of B. cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1461 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–925 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · Botrytis cinerea · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.