Paper · 1984 · Annals of Applied Biology

Nitrogen fertilisation and light effects on growth and photosynthesis of lodgepole pine seedlings

S.A. EKWEBELAM; C.P.P. REID

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance (100, 210 and 470 μEm ‐2 s ‐1 ) and three levels of ammonium nitrate (3, 62 and 248 mg litre ‐1 of N). Measurements at 5, 10 and 16 wk of age indicated that plants receiving the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogen had significantly larger biomass, a higher total foliar N and P content and net photosynthesis per unit leaf area than those at lower levels of each factor. Although the root/shoot ratio also increased from low to high irradiance at each harvest, nitrogen application resulted in an increased ratio from 3 to 62 mg litre ‐1 N, but decreased ratio at 248 mg litre ‐1 N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest irradiance and nitrogen levels gave significantly larger biomass in Pinus contorta seedlings than lower levels

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogene1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
lower levels of each factore1
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants receiving the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogen had significantly larger biomass, a higher total foliar N and P content and net photosynthesis per unit leaf area than those at lower levels of each factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest irradiance and nitrogen levels gave a higher total foliar N and P content in Pinus contorta seedlings than lower levels

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogene1
Outcome
total foliar N and P contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
lower levels of each factore1
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants receiving the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogen had significantly larger biomass, a higher total foliar N and P content and net photosynthesis per unit leaf area than those at lower levels of each factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest irradiance and nitrogen levels gave higher net photosynthesis per unit leaf area in Pinus contorta seedlings than lower levels

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogene1
Outcome
net photosynthesis per unit leaf areae1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
lower levels of each factore1
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants receiving the highest levels of irradiance and nitrogen had significantly larger biomass, a higher total foliar N and P content and net photosynthesis per unit leaf area than those at lower levels of each factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root/shoot ratio of Pinus contorta increased from low to high irradiance at each harvest

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
irradiancee2
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
lowe2
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although the root/shoot ratio also increased from low to high irradiance at each harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased the root/shoot ratio of Pinus contorta from 3 to 62 mg per litre

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione3
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe2
Direction
increasede3
Value
3 to 62 mg litree3
Comparator
from 3e3
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although the root/shoot ratio also increased from low to high irradiance at each harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“nitrogen application resulted in an increased ratio from 3 to 62 mg litre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 248 mg per litre decreased the root/shoot ratio of Pinus contorta

Taxon
Pinus contortaPinus contortae0
Treatment
nitrogen applicatione3
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe2
Direction
decreasede4
Value
248e4
Comparator
from 3e3
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus contorta
Pinus contorta · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of Pinus contorta were grown for 16 wk without ectomycorrhizas in the greenhouse at three levels of irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although the root/shoot ratio also increased from low to high irradiance at each harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“nitrogen application resulted in an increased ratio from 3 to 62 mg litre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–669 · show in text ↑
e4

“but decreased ratio at 248 mg litre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–711 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.