Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of swine manure and urea on soil phosphorus supply to canola

P. Qian; J. J. Schoenau

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Limited information exists as to the effect of liquid swine manure on soil phosphorus (P) availability in Western Canadian soil. Swine manure is most often applied to meet additional requirements for nitrogen (N) and research to date has emphasized N effects. The effect of swine manure and urea on P supply to canola was investigated under controlled environment condition. Canola (Brassica napus) was grown in pots with manure or urea added to two Saskatchewan soils (sandy loam and clay loam) at 0 and 100 mg N kg‐1. Plants were grown to maturity, and yield and nutrient content were determined. Phosphorus supply rates in soils were measured in the pots using anion exchange resin membrane probes. Additions of swine manure and urea enhanced canola P accumulation and led to a higher proportion of P in seeds. This response was more evident in the manure treatment than with urea. Soil amended with manure significantly increased N and P supply rates in soils as the manure contains N and P. On the contrary, application of urea significantly increased N supply rate, but led to a slight decrease in the measured soil supply rate of available P. Despite the apparent decrease in soil supply of available P in urea treatment, canola maintained its N:P ratio by increasing P absorption, possibly due to a greater root mass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Swine manure increased canola phosphorus accumulation.

Treatment
swine manuree0
Outcome
canola P accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of swine manure and urea enhanced canola P accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased canola phosphorus accumulation.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
canola P accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of swine manure and urea enhanced canola P accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and urea raised the proportion of phosphorus in canola seeds, more evidently with manure.

Treatment
manure treatmente0
Outcome
proportion of P in seedse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
more evidente0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additions of swine manure and urea enhanced canola P accumulation and led to a higher proportion of P in seeds. This response was more evident in the manure treatment than with urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure significantly increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus supply rates in canola pots.

Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
N and P supply rates in soilse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil amended with manure significantly increased N and P supply rates in soils as the manure contains N and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea significantly increased soil nitrogen supply rate.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
N supply ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of urea significantly increased N supply rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea slightly decreased measured soil available phosphorus supply rate.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
measured soil supply rate of available Pe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of urea significantly increased N supply rate, but led to a slight decrease in the measured soil supply rate of available P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Despite lower available soil phosphorus supply under urea, canola maintained its nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio by absorbing more phosphorus.

Treatment
urea treatmente0
Outcome
maintained its N:P ratioe0
Qualifier
increasing P absorption, possibly due to a greater root masse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the apparent decrease in soil supply of available P in urea treatment, canola maintained its N:P ratio by increasing P absorption, possibly due to a greater root mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1334 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 46 positive, 7 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.