Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

STUDIES ON DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF SPRING CANOLA CULTIVARS TO BORON TOXICITY

Ö. Öztürk; S. Soylu; R. Ada; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Although many states recommend boron (B) fertilizer for many field crops, information about B toxicity of canola is lacking. This experiment was carried out at Central Anatolia, Turkey from 2002 to 2003, to determine genotypic range in B efficiency of eight spring canola cultivars, to identify the B-inefficient cultivars and to identify specific responses. The cultivars were grown under B moderate deficiency (extractable B 0.56 mg kg−1) and toxic B applied (15 kg B ha−1) conditions. According to the results, seed yield varied significantly among the cultivars and B application decreased the seed yield by 31% on average. Also, toxic B application reduced protein and oil contents similar to seed yield, and increased leaf B concentration in all varieties. This study has shown that leaf B concentration has increased considerably when B is applied to Pactol and Star cultivars, but seed yield of +B and −B has not shown significantly a change. It is possible to say that Star and Pactol—which have not been affected by the toxic B application—are genotypes that are tolerant to B toxicity and may be cultivated at B toxic lands. Keywords: boron toxicityinteractionoil ratioprotein ratioseed yieldcanola ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The financial support for this study was provided by the Turkish State Planning Organization (DPT) (Project No. 1999 K120560). The assistance of Dr. Fatma Gökmen in soil analysis, and Mr. Nesim Dursun and Mr. Ali Kahraman in the analysis of B by ICP is gratefully acknowledged.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield differed significantly among canola cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
seed yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield varied significantly among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPRING CANOLA CULTIVARS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron application decreased average canola seed yield by 31%.

Treatment
B applicatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
31%e0
Comparator
B moderate deficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B application decreased the seed yield by 31% on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–635 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cultivars were grown under B moderate deficiency (extractable B 0.56 mg kg−1) and toxic B applied (15 kg B ha−1) conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic boron reduced protein content in canola.

Treatment
toxic B applicatione0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“toxic B application reduced protein and oil contents similar to seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic boron reduced oil content in canola.

Treatment
toxic B applicatione0
Outcome
oil contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“toxic B application reduced protein and oil contents similar to seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic boron increased leaf boron concentration in all canola varieties.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
toxic B applicatione1
Outcome
leaf B concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf B concentration in all varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“toxic B application reduced protein and oil contents similar to seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied boron considerably increased leaf boron concentration in Pactol.

Material
Pactole0
Treatment
B is appliede0
Outcome
leaf B concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf B concentration has increased considerably when B is applied to Pactol and Star cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied boron considerably increased leaf boron concentration in Star.

Material
Stare0
Treatment
B is appliede0
Outcome
leaf B concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf B concentration has increased considerably when B is applied to Pactol and Star cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of Pactol and Star did not change significantly between boron conditions.

Material
Pactol and Star cultivarse1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
a changee0
Comparator
−Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield of +B and −B has not shown significantly a change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–958 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pactol and Star cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Pactol and Star can be cultivated on boron-toxic land.

Material
Star and Pactole0
Outcome
may be cultivated at B toxic landse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Star and Pactol—which have not been affected by the toxic B application—are genotypes that are tolerant to B toxicity and may be cultivated at B toxic lands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: protein · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

boron atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 16 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.