Paper · 2007 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of foliar and root applied nitrogen on nitrogen uptake and movement in white clover at low temperature

M. L. Castle; J. R. Crush; J. S. Rowarth

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract ‘Grasslands Huia’ white clover plants were grown at a constant root and shoot temperature of 8°C in a controlled environment room. Nitrate or urea labelled with 15 N was applied to the foliage, foliage plus the roots, or to the roots only. After 21 days, plants supplied with foliar nitrogen (N) or with N to the foliage plus roots, produced significantly ( P < 0.05) more lamina dry weight than plants supplied with N to the roots only. Plants supplied with N to the foliage contained significantly ( P < 0.05) more lamina 15 N than plants supplied with N to the foliage plus the roots or to the roots only. From 14 days onwards, plants supplied with foliar N, or N to the foliage plus the roots, had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher leaf areas than plants supplied with N to the roots only, irrespective of the form of N applied. By 21 days, plants supplied with foliar nitrate or urea had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance rates, and lamina sucrose concentrations, than plants supplied with N to the roots. The experiment demonstrated the importance of N availability as a rate‐limiting factor on starch and sucrose synthesis and, in turn, on foliage growth at low temperatures in white clover.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar N, or N to the foliage plus roots, gave more white clover lamina dry weight than N to the roots only.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
foliar nitrogene3
Outcome
lamina dry weighte1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
N to the roots onlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in white clover at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants supplied with foliar nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–300 · show in text ↑
e1

“more lamina dry weight than plants supplied with N to the roots only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar N, or N to the foliage plus roots, gave higher white clover leaf area than N to the roots only from 14 days onwards.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
foliar Ne4
Outcome
leaf arease4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
From 14 days onwardse5
Comparator
N to the roots onlye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in white clover at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“plants supplied with foliar N, or N to the foliage plus the roots, had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher leaf areas than plants supplied with N to the roots only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–800 · show in text ↑
e5

“From 14 days onwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage-supplied N gave white clover more lamina 15N than N to the foliage plus roots or to the roots only.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
N to the foliagee6
Outcome
lamina 15 Ne6
Direction
moree6
Comparator
N to the foliage plus the roots or to the roots onlye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in white clover at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plants supplied with N to the foliage contained significantly ( P < 0.05) more lamina 15 N than plants supplied with N to the foliage plus the roots or to the roots only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

By 21 days, foliar nitrate or urea raised white clover photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance above N to the roots.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
foliar nitrate or ureae7
Outcome
photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance ratese7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
By 21 dayse7
Comparator
N to the rootse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in white clover at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“By 21 days, plants supplied with foliar nitrate or urea had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance rates, and lamina sucrose concentrations, than plants supplied with N to the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

By 21 days, foliar nitrate or urea raised lamina sucrose concentrations above N to the roots in white clover.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
foliar nitrate or ureae7
Outcome
lamina sucrose concentrationse7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
By 21 dayse7
Comparator
N to the rootse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in white clover at low temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“By 21 days, plants supplied with foliar nitrate or urea had significantly ( P < 0.05) higher photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance rates, and lamina sucrose concentrations, than plants supplied with N to the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1068 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N availability appears to be a rate-limiting factor for starch and sucrose synthesis and, in turn, for foliage growth of white clover at low temperature.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
N availabilitye0
Outcome
foliage growthe0
Qualifier
starch and sucrose synthesise0
Setting
at low temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The experiment demonstrated the importance of N availability as a rate‐limiting factor on starch and sucrose synthesis and, in turn, on foliage growth at low temperatures in white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1256 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.