Paper · 2009 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Effects of Post‐Anthesis Drought and Waterlogging on Accumulation of High‐Molecular‐Weight Glutenin Subunits and Glutenin Macropolymers Content in Wheat Grain

D. Jiang; H. Yue; B. Wollenweber; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Drought and flooding during grain filling have become major constraints to wheat quality and yield. The impacts of water deficits and waterlogging during the grain filling on contents of high‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS) and of glutenin macropolymers (GMP) in grains of the winter wheat cultivar Yumai 34 with high grain protein content (GPC) and Yangmai 9 with low GPC were studied. At maturity, GPC was higher under drought and lower under waterlogging compared to the control, while contents of GMP and HMW‐GS were reduced by the two water‐stress treatments. The contents of both HMW‐GS and GMP were higher in Yumai 34 than in Yangmai 9. A drought event after anthesis increased the accumulation of HMW‐GS during the early grain filling stage. By contrast, waterlogging reduced the accumulation of HMW‐GS during the whole grain filling phase. At maturity, the HMW‐GS and GMP to protein ratios were also depressed under the two water‐stress events, while the HMW‐GS to GMP ratio was very close between the three treatments in Yumai 34 and much higher under the control than the drought and waterlogging treaments in Yangmai 9. It is concluded that the variation in GMP content with various water‐stress treatments is attributed to the changing in accumulation of HMW‐GS in the grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought after anthesis raised grain protein content relative to the control.

Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
GPCe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, GPC was higher under drought and lower under waterlogging compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging lowered grain protein content relative to the control.

Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
GPCe1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“At maturity, GPC was higher under drought and lower under waterlogging compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two water-stress treatments reduced the contents of GMP and HMW‐GS.

Treatment
two water‐stress treatmentse2
Outcome
contents of GMP and HMW‐GSe2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“while contents of GMP and HMW‐GS were reduced by the two water‐stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–584 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contents of both HMW‐GS and GMP were higher in Yumai 34 than in Yangmai 9.

Material
Yumai 34e3
Outcome
contents of both HMW‐GS and GMPe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
Yangmai 9e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e3

“The contents of both HMW‐GS and GMP were higher in Yumai 34 than in Yangmai 9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A drought event after anthesis increased HMW‐GS accumulation in the early grain filling stage.

Organ / stage
early grain filling stagee4
Treatment
drought event after anthesise4
Outcome
accumulation of HMW‐GSe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e4

“A drought event after anthesis increased the accumulation of HMW‐GS during the early grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging reduced HMW‐GS accumulation during the whole grain filling phase.

Organ / stage
whole grain filling phasee5
Treatment
waterlogginge5
Outcome
accumulation of HMW‐GSe5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“waterlogging reduced the accumulation of HMW‐GS during the whole grain filling phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two water-stress events depressed the HMW‐GS and GMP to protein ratios at maturity.

Treatment
two water‐stress eventse6
Outcome
HMW‐GS and GMP to protein ratiose6
Direction
depressede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e6

“the HMW‐GS and GMP to protein ratios were also depressed under the two water‐stress events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–973 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variation in GMP content is attributed to changing HMW‐GS accumulation in the grain.

Gene
HMW‐GSe7
Outcome
variation in GMP contente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“the variation in GMP content with various water‐stress treatments is attributed to the changing in accumulation of HMW‐GS in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1308 · show in text ↑

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 8 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.