Paper · 1996 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Nickel toxicity in two durum wheat cultivars differing in drought sensitivity

T. Pandolfini; R. Gabbrielli; M. Ciscato

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of nickel (Ni) on growth, leaf water status, and mineral nutrient concentration were studied in two wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars with different sensitivity to water stress: ‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]. The DT cultivar showed a higher Ni absorption capacity: ‘Ofanto’ seedlings grown in the presence of 35 μM Ni had a 3.5 times greater concentration of Ni in roots than did ‘Adamello’. Despite the greater Ni tissue content, the DT cultivar exhibited better growth and nutritional status when compared to the DS cultivar. In the DS cultivar the concentration of chlorophyll a and b was reduced by Ni treatment. Chlorophyll a concentration decreased in the DT cultivar, but to a lesser extent than in the DS cultivar; chlorophyll b was not altered by Ni level in the DT cultivar. Nickel caused a decrease in the water potential (ψw) and relative water content (RWC) in both cultivars, but these decreases were greater in the DS cultivar. The antioxidative defense enzymes, guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, showed increased activity in Ni‐treated DS seedlings; this increase in activity was not observed in the DT seedlings. These data suggest that different wheat genotypes may markedly differ in Ni uptake and sensitivity and that a enhanced capacity to counteract Ni stress may be associated with drought resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ofanto seedlings had 3.5 times the root nickel concentration of Adamello at 35 μM Ni.

Material
‘Ofanto’e0
Treatment
35 μM Nie0
Outcome
concentration of Ni in rootse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3.5 timese0
Comparator
‘Adamello’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Ofanto’ seedlings grown in the presence of 35 μM Ni had a 3.5 times greater concentration of Ni in roots than did ‘Adamello’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–451 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ofanto maintained better growth and nutritional status than Adamello despite more tissue nickel.

Material
‘Ofanto’e1
Outcome
growth and nutritional statuse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
‘Adamello’e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the greater Ni tissue content, the DT cultivar exhibited better growth and nutritional status when compared to the DS cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–588 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel reduced both chlorophyll a and b in the drought-sensitive cultivar.

Material
‘Adamello’e1
Treatment
Ni treatmente0
Outcome
concentration of chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the DS cultivar the concentration of chlorophyll a and b was reduced by Ni treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–230 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel decreased chlorophyll a in Ofanto, less than in Adamello.

Material
‘Ofanto’e1
Outcome
Chlorophyll a concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
‘Adamello’e1

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a concentration decreased in the DT cultivar, but to a lesser extent than in the DS cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel level did not alter chlorophyll b in Ofanto.

Material
‘Ofanto’e1
Treatment
Ni levele0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll b was not altered by Ni level in the DT cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel lowered water potential and relative water content in both cultivars, more strongly in Adamello.

Material
‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]e1
Treatment
Nickele0
Outcome
water potential (ψw) and relative water content (RWC)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
greater in the DS cultivare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel caused a decrease in the water potential (ψw) and relative water content (RWC) in both cultivars, but these decreases were greater in the DS cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)] and ‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel increased three antioxidative enzyme activities in Adamello seedlings.

Material
‘Adamello’e1
Treatment
Ni‐treatede0
Gene
guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductasee0
Outcome
activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, showed increased activity in Ni‐treated DS seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Adamello’ [drought sensitive (DS)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–230 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same enzyme activity increase was absent in Ofanto seedlings.

Material
‘Ofanto’e1
Outcome
increase in activitye0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this increase in activity was not observed in the DT seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“‘Ofanto’ [drought tolerant, (DT)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–34 · show in text ↑