Paper · 1983 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The effect of time of sowing on the grain yield of irrigated wheat in the Namoi Valley, New South Wales

GK McDonald; BG Sutton; FW Ellison

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
95
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of time of sowing on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W. Sowing dates, which ranged from mid-April to mid-August, encompassed the period of sowing normally found with commercial crops. The length of the pre-anthesis period was affected by both temperature and photoperiod. There was evidence of a vernalization requirement for some of the winter and midseason cultivars, but, overall, photoperiod was the more important environmental factor determining pre-anthesis development. Each day's delay in sowing caused a delay of between 0.48 and 0.75 days in anthesis; the delays observed for spring wheats were generally greater than those reported for dryland wheat in eastern Australia. Winter cultivars generally did not show an optimum sowing or anthesis date. For spring cultivars, the optimum time of sowing was early June (range of about 3 weeks), while the optimum anthesis date was the last week of September (range of 1 week). Grain yields of spring cultivars were reduced by 6 and 16% per week's delay in sowing and anthesis respectively. Despite a non-limiting water supply, yields at late plantings were low, which was largely the result of hastened crop development and high temperatures during grain-filling. The environmental factors which determined the optimum sowing and anthesis dates were the incidence of early spring frosts and high spring temperatures. If frosts were not a factor at Narrabri, the optimum time of flowering would be 6-8 weeks earlier than the present optimum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each day of sowing delay delayed anthesis by 0.48 to 0.75 days.

Treatment
delay in sowinge1
Outcome
anthesise1
Direction
delaye1
Value
between 0.48 and 0.75 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Each day's delay in sowing caused a delay of between 0.48 and 0.75 days in anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod was a more important environmental factor than temperature in determining pre-anthesis development.

Treatment
photoperiode2
Outcome
pre-anthesis developmente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“photoperiod was the more important environmental factor determining pre-anthesis development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some winter and midseason cultivars had a vernalization requirement.

Material
winter and midseason cultivarse3
Outcome
vernalization requiremente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was evidence of a vernalization requirement for some of the winter and midseason cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–432 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter cultivars generally did not show an optimum sowing or anthesis date.

Material
Winter cultivarse4
Outcome
optimum sowing or anthesis datee4
Qualifier
generallye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“Winter cultivars generally did not show an optimum sowing or anthesis date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–822 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For spring cultivars the optimum sowing time was early June.

Material
spring cultivarse5
Outcome
optimum time of sowinge5
Value
early Junee5
Qualifier
range of about 3 weekse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“For spring cultivars, the optimum time of sowing was early June (range of about 3 weeks)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–912 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For spring cultivars the optimum anthesis date was the last week of September.

Material
spring cultivarse5
Outcome
optimum anthesis datee6
Value
last week of Septembere6
Qualifier
range of 1 weeke6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“For spring cultivars, the optimum time of sowing was early June (range of about 3 weeks)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–912 · show in text ↑
e6

“the optimum anthesis date was the last week of September (range of 1 week)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each week of sowing delay reduced spring-cultivar grain yield by 6%.

Material
spring cultivarse7
Treatment
delay in sowinge7
Outcome
Grain yieldse7
Direction
reducede7
Value
6e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain yields of spring cultivars were reduced by 6 and 16% per week's delay in sowing and anthesis respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each week of anthesis delay reduced spring-cultivar grain yield by 16%.

Material
spring cultivarse7
Treatment
anthesise7
Outcome
Grain yieldse7
Direction
reducede7
Value
16%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain yields of spring cultivars were reduced by 6 and 16% per week's delay in sowing and anthesis respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields at late plantings were low despite a non-limiting water supply.

Treatment
late plantingse7
Outcome
yieldse7
Direction
lowe7
Qualifier
Despite a non-limiting water supplye7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“Despite a non-limiting water supply, yields at late plantings were low, which was largely the result of hastened crop development and high temperatures during grain-filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1281 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low yields at late plantings were largely due to hastened crop development and high temperatures during grain-filling.

Outcome
yieldse7
Qualifier
hastened crop development and high temperatures during grain-fillinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“Despite a non-limiting water supply, yields at late plantings were low, which was largely the result of hastened crop development and high temperatures during grain-filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1281 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early spring frosts and high spring temperatures determined the optimum sowing and anthesis dates.

Outcome
optimum sowing and anthesis datese7
Qualifier
incidence of early spring frosts and high spring temperaturese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“The environmental factors which determined the optimum sowing and anthesis dates were the incidence of early spring frosts and high spring temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1434 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Without frosts at Narrabri, optimum flowering would be 6-8 weeks earlier.

Treatment
frosts were not a factore7
Outcome
optimum time of floweringe7
Direction
earliere7
Value
6-8 weekse7
Setting
Narrabrie7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“If frosts were not a factor at Narrabri, the optimum time of flowering would be 6-8 weeks earlier than the present optimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delays of anthesis for spring wheats were generally greater than those for dryland wheat in eastern Australia.

Outcome
delayse7
Direction
greatere7
Qualifier
generallye7
Comparator
dryland wheat in eastern Australiae7
Setting
eastern Australiae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the yield of 15 wheat cultivars grown under irrigation was examined at Narrabri, N.S.W.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–119 · show in text ↑
e7

“the delays observed for spring wheats were generally greater than those reported for dryland wheat in eastern Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–746 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 266 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

458 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.