Paper · 1968 · Physiologia Plantarum

The Effect of CCC and Amo‐1618 on Growth, Catalase, Peroxidase and Indoleacetic Acid Oxidase Activity of Young Barley Seedlings

Thomas Caspar; Josiane Lacoppe

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
48
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Barley seedlings were grown in darkness on filter paper saturated with phosphate buffer or CCC and Amo‐1618 buffered solutions. The effects of CCC and Amo‐1618 on growth, catalase, peroxidase and lAA‐oxidase were studied on coleoptile and primary leaves. Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC. They have no effect on catalase activity. Increasing concentrations of CCC and Amo‐1618 progressively stimulate peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities (Amo‐1618 more than CCC). The enzymatic activity in short‐treated plants is higher than in the corresponding control plants of the same height. It is proposed that CCC and Amo‐1618 exert their effect on the growth of barley by acting on auxin catabolism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC inhibited barley seedling growth.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amo‐1618 inhibited barley seedling growth more effectively than CCC.

Treatment
Amo‐1618e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Comparator
CCCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–366 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC and Amo‐1618 had no reported effect on catalase activity.

Treatment
growth‐retarding chemicalse0
Outcome
catalase activitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC. They have no effect on catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing CCC concentrations progressively stimulated peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activitiese0
Direction
stimulatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of CCC and Amo‐1618 progressively stimulate peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities (Amo‐1618 more than CCC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Amo‐1618 concentrations progressively stimulated peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities more than CCC.

Treatment
Amo‐1618e0
Outcome
peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activitiese0
Direction
stimulatee0
Comparator
CCCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing concentrations of CCC and Amo‐1618 progressively stimulate peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities (Amo‐1618 more than CCC).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enzymatic activity was higher in short-treated plants than control plants of the same height.

Treatment
short‐treated plantse0
Outcome
enzymatic activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
corresponding control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enzymatic activity in short‐treated plants is higher than in the corresponding control plants of the same height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.