Claim · model-written summary
CCC and Amo‐1618 had no reported effect on catalase activity.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- growth‐retarding chemicalse0
- Outcome
- catalase activitye0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC. They have no effect on catalase activity.”
t0“Barley”
Title
Thomas Caspar; Josiane Lacoppe Physiologia Plantarum 1968. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1968.tb07338.x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect CCC inhibited barley seedling growth.
- Intervention effect Amo‐1618 inhibited barley seedling growth more effectively than CCC.
- Intervention effect Increasing CCC concentrations progressively stimulated peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities.
- Intervention effect Increasing Amo‐1618 concentrations progressively stimulated peroxidase and IAA‐oxidase activities more than CCC.
- Intervention effect Enzymatic activity was higher in short-treated plants than control plants of the same height.