Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CCC inhibited barley seedling growth.

A claim from The Effect of CCC and Amo‐1618 on Growth, Catalase, Peroxidase and Indoleacetic Acid Oxidase Activity of Young Barley Seedlings · 1968

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC inhibited barley seedling growth.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both growth‐retarding chemicals cause an inhibition of growth, Amo‐1618 being more effective than CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–366
t0

“Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–117

Title

The Effect of CCC and Amo‐1618 on Growth, Catalase, Peroxidase and Indoleacetic Acid Oxidase Activity of Young Barley Seedlings

Thomas Caspar; Josiane Lacoppe Physiologia Plantarum 1968. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1968.tb07338.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bdb6e10a9fc00a56908ef7942fe47bd28c947a33de7ec445317cb10ed3a17f84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.