Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Use of growth regulators for lodging tolerance and increasing productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare): An empirical study

A S KHARUB; HARI RAM; BHAGAT SINGH; et al.

9
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra to evaluate the efficacy of plant growth regulators (CCC, ethephon and their combination) to reduce lodging and enhance productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under high nitrogen level. Results revealed that application of 75 kg N/ha increased the grain yield by 3.17% over the recommended 60 kg/ha. The pooled mean lodging score with the application of growth regulators, viz. CCC, ethephon and combination of both was 5.21, 4.28 and 3.03 respectively, while without growth regulators application the lodging score was 9.57. With the application of plant growth regulator, the yield increased in the range of 2.5–4.1 q/ha (5.7–9.4%). The effect of CCC was relatively lesser as compared to ethephon, however the combination of both gave additive effect on yield increment (8.78%). Application of growth regulators increased 1000-grain weight by 6.21% over control. Therefore, the use of plant growth regulators i.e. CCC and ethephon under high nitrogen (75 kg N/ha) can be advocated as a sustainable strategy to enhance the productivity of barley through decreasing lodging problem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 75 kg N/ha increased barley grain yield by 3.17% over the recommended 60 kg/ha.

Treatment
75 kg N/hae1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.17%e1
Comparator
recommended 60 kg/hae1
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 75 kg N/ha increased the grain yield by 3.17% over the recommended 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC lowered the barley pooled mean lodging score relative to no growth regulators (5.21 against 9.57).

Treatment
CCCe2
Outcome
lodging scoree2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
5.21e2
Comparator
without growth regulators applicatione2
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pooled mean lodging score with the application of growth regulators, viz. CCC, ethephon and combination of both was 5.21, 4.28 and 3.03 respectively, while without growth regulators application the lodging score was 9.57”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon lowered the barley pooled mean lodging score relative to no growth regulators (4.28 against 9.57).

Treatment
ethephone2
Outcome
lodging scoree2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
4.28e2
Comparator
without growth regulators applicatione2
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pooled mean lodging score with the application of growth regulators, viz. CCC, ethephon and combination of both was 5.21, 4.28 and 3.03 respectively, while without growth regulators application the lodging score was 9.57”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of CCC and ethephon lowered the barley pooled mean lodging score relative to no growth regulators (3.03 against 9.57).

Treatment
combination of bothe2
Outcome
lodging scoree2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
3.03e2
Comparator
without growth regulators applicatione2
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pooled mean lodging score with the application of growth regulators, viz. CCC, ethephon and combination of both was 5.21, 4.28 and 3.03 respectively, while without growth regulators application the lodging score was 9.57”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators increased barley yield by 2.5–4.1 q/ha (5.7–9.4%).

Treatment
plant growth regulatore3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
2.5–4.1 q/ha (5.7–9.4%)e3
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“With the application of plant growth regulator, the yield increased in the range of 2.5–4.1 q/ha (5.7–9.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of CCC on barley yield was relatively lesser than that of ethephon.

Treatment
CCCe4
Outcome
effecte4
Direction
lessere4
Comparator
ethephone4
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of CCC was relatively lesser as compared to ethephon, however the combination of both gave additive effect on yield increment (8.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of CCC and ethephon gave an additive effect on barley yield increment of 8.78%.

Treatment
combination of bothe4
Outcome
yield incremente4
Direction
additivee4
Value
8.78%e4
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of CCC was relatively lesser as compared to ethephon, however the combination of both gave additive effect on yield increment (8.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators increased barley 1000-grain weight by 6.21% over control.

Treatment
growth regulatorse5
Outcome
1000-grain weighte5
Direction
increasede5
Value
6.21%e5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field study was carried out during winter (rabi) seasons of 2015–16 to 2017–18 at Karnal, Hisar, Ludhiana, Durgapura and Agra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of growth regulators increased 1000-grain weight by 6.21% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–996 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators CCC and ethephon under high nitrogen can be advocated as a sustainable strategy to enhance barley productivity by decreasing lodging.

Outcome
use of plant growth regulatorse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“the use of plant growth regulators i.e. CCC and ethephon under high nitrogen (75 kg N/ha) can be advocated as a sustainable strategy to enhance the productivity of barley through decreasing lodging problem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1214 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

class · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.