Paper · 1991 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Response of winter barley cultivars to nitrogen and a plant growth regulator in relation to lodging

E. M. White

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure and induce differing degrees of damage due to leaning and lodging in six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87. Weighted incidences of leaning and lodging were combined to give an index indicating damage susceptibility of the cultivars. The index was very high (70) in Pipkin and ranged between 1 and 18 in the other cultivars. Differences between cultivars in number of internodes, plant height and stem weight did not explain their differences in resistance to damage. However, dry weight per unit length ranged from 2·35 and 2·34 mg/mm in the strongest cultivars, Panda and Jennifer, respectively, to 1·75 mg/mm in the weakest cultivar, Pipkin. Nitrogen application increased plant height but did not affect dry weight/main stem, so that dry weight/unit length of stem decreased. The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight/stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight/unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots. Dry weight/unit length has potential as an objective indicator of straw strength in winter barley cultivars and could be used in cultivar evaluation in the absence of damage in field trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pipkin had a very high lodging damage susceptibility index (70), while the other cultivars ranged from 1 to 18.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
Pipkine1
Outcome
indexe1
Value
70e1
Qualifier
ranged between 1 and 18 in the other cultivarse1
Setting
Belfast, UKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e1

“The index was very high (70) in Pipkin and ranged between 1 and 18 in the other cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between cultivars in number of internodes, plant height and stem weight did not explain their differences in resistance to damage.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
cultivarse2
Outcome
resistance to damagee2
Direction
did not explaine2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e2

“Differences between cultivars in number of internodes, plant height and stem weight did not explain their differences in resistance to damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panda had dry weight per unit length of 2·35 mg/mm, among the strongest cultivars.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
Pandae3
Outcome
dry weight per unit lengthe3
Value
2·35e3
Qualifier
strongest cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e3

“dry weight per unit length ranged from 2·35 and 2·34 mg/mm in the strongest cultivars, Panda and Jennifer, respectively, to 1·75 mg/mm in the weakest cultivar, Pipkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jennifer had dry weight per unit length of 2·34 mg/mm, among the strongest cultivars.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
Jennifere3
Outcome
dry weight per unit lengthe3
Value
2·34e3
Qualifier
strongest cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e3

“dry weight per unit length ranged from 2·35 and 2·34 mg/mm in the strongest cultivars, Panda and Jennifer, respectively, to 1·75 mg/mm in the weakest cultivar, Pipkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pipkin had dry weight per unit length of 1·75 mg/mm, the lowest among the cultivars.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Material
Pipkine3
Outcome
dry weight per unit lengthe3
Value
1·75 mg/mme3
Qualifier
weakest cultivare3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e3

“dry weight per unit length ranged from 2·35 and 2·34 mg/mm in the strongest cultivars, Panda and Jennifer, respectively, to 1·75 mg/mm in the weakest cultivar, Pipkin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased plant height.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Belfast, UKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen application increased plant height but did not affect dry weight/main stem, so that dry weight/unit length of stem decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application did not affect dry weight per main stem.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione4
Outcome
dry weight/main steme4
Direction
did not affecte4
Setting
Belfast, UKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen application increased plant height but did not affect dry weight/main stem, so that dry weight/unit length of stem decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application decreased dry weight per unit length of stem.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Nitrogen applicatione4
Outcome
dry weight/unit length of steme4
Direction
decreasede4
Setting
Belfast, UKe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen application increased plant height but did not affect dry weight/main stem, so that dry weight/unit length of stem decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride and ethephone6
Outcome
plant heighte5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight/stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight/unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e6

“Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth regulator treatments did not significantly decrease dry weight per stem.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride and ethephone6
Outcome
dry weight/steme5
Direction
did not decrease significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight/stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight/unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e6

“Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight per unit length of stem was similar in growth-regulator-treated and untreated plots.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
mepiquat chloride and ethephone6
Outcome
dry weight/unit length of steme5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
untreated plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight/stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight/unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 · show in text ↑
e6

“Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight per unit length has potential as an objective indicator of straw strength and could be used in cultivar evaluation in the absence of damage in field trials.

Taxon
winter barleyHordeum vulgaree7
Outcome
objective indicator of straw strengthe7
Setting
field trialse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Dry weight/unit length has potential as an objective indicator of straw strength in winter barley cultivars and could be used in cultivar evaluation in the absence of damage in field trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1317 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

110 papers: 66 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.