Paper · 1938 · Annals of Applied Biology

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF COBALT, NICKEL AND COPPER ON PLANT GROWTH

WINIFRED E. BRENCHLEY

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
27
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY 1. An account is given of the present position of our knowledge with regard to the distribution and the physiological importance of nickel and cobalt, in relation to plants and animals. 2. Experiments on barley and broad beans were carried out in water cultures with the sulphates and chlorides of cobalt, nickel and copper. 3. In every case a range of low concentrations did little or no damage, but toxic action occurred abruptly above a concentration which varied with the species and with the compound. 4. With barley, copper was the most poisonous element in either compound, but the differences were not striking. Low concentrations of the sulphate were innocuous, but parallel low strengths of the chloride caused a slight, significant depression in growth. 5. With broad beans, cobalt was much more poisonous than either nickel or copper, particularly with the sulphate. No slight depression with low concentrations of the chloride was noticeable with this species. 6. The morphological response to toxicity varied with the element concerned. Copper, in poisonous strengths, caused shortening and “bunching” of barley roots, whereas nickel and cobalt permitted the growth of elongated roots of a very attenuated nature. 7. The individuality of plant response to poison was frequently shown by the great variation in growth in the borderline concentrations just below those which caused marked depression of growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low concentrations of the salts caused little or no damage, whereas toxicity appeared abruptly above species- and compound-dependent thresholds.

Taxon
barley and broad beansVicia fabaHordeum vulgaree1
Outcome
toxic actione0
Direction
occurred abruptlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In every case a range of low concentrations did little or no damage, but toxic action occurred abruptly above a concentration which varied with the species and with the compound.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley and broad beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper was the most poisonous element for barley in either compound.

Treatment
coppere0
Outcome
most poisonous elemente0
Direction
most poisonouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With barley, copper was the most poisonous element in either compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low sulphate concentrations were innocuous to barley, while corresponding chloride strengths significantly depressed growth.

Treatment
chloridee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
depressione0
Comparator
sulphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low concentrations of the sulphate were innocuous, but parallel low strengths of the chloride caused a slight, significant depression in growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“With barley, copper was the most poisonous element in either compound”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cobalt was much more poisonous to broad beans than nickel or copper, particularly as sulphate.

Taxon
broad beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
cobalte0
Outcome
more poisonouse0
Direction
more poisonouse0
Comparator
nickel or coppere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With broad beans, cobalt was much more poisonous than either nickel or copper, particularly with the sulphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low chloride concentrations caused no noticeable slight depression in broad beans.

Taxon
broad beansVicia fabae1
Treatment
low concentrations of the chloridee0
Outcome
slight depressione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No slight depression with low concentrations of the chloride was noticeable with this species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“With broad beans, cobalt was much more poisonous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic copper shortened and bunched barley roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Copper, in poisonous strengthse0
Outcome
shortening and “bunching” of barley rootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper, in poisonous strengths, caused shortening and “bunching” of barley roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxic nickel and cobalt permitted elongated, attenuated barley roots.

Treatment
nickel and cobalte0
Outcome
growth of elongated roots of a very attenuated naturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas nickel and cobalt permitted the growth of elongated roots of a very attenuated nature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual growth varied greatly at borderline concentrations below those causing marked depression.

Outcome
variation in growthe0
Qualifier
borderline concentrationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“great variation in growth in the borderline concentrations just below those which caused marked depression of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant response to poison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1284 · show in text ↑

chloride · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.