Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural Sciences Belgrade

Effects of fertilization and irrigation on the elements of yield of the wine grape variety Vranac

Tatjana Popovic; Slavko Mijovic; Danijela Raicevic; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

This work presents the three-year results of the effects of mineral and different types of organic fertilizers on the elements of the yield (the relative coefficient of fertility, the absolute coefficient of fertility, cluster weight and the yield of grapes per area unit) of the Vranac variety of grape. The research was carried out in Podgorica vineyard, at the location Ljeskopolje. Eight different variants of nutrition were applied: (1) control (without fertilization); (2) NPK (8:16:24) - 500 kg/ha; (3) cow manure - 20 t/ha; (4) poultry manure - 10 t/ha; (5) peat - 10 t/ha; (6) cow manure + poultry manure - 10 + 5 t/ha; (7) cow manure + peat - 10 + 5 t/ha; (8) poultry manure + peat - 5 + 5 t/ha. All the variants of nutrition were tested under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. The results showed that the relative coefficient of fertility in all the tested variants of nutrition had high values. Regarding the number of inflorescences per productive shoot in a three-year average, a particularly good variant was the cow manure and the variant with the combination of poultry manure and peat. The application of mineral and different types of organic fertilizers had a positive effect on the average cluster weight. The variant with the combination of poultry manure and peat gave the highest average cluster weight in the three-year average. All the tested variants of nutrition in the three-year average had a higher yield than the variant without fertilization. The variant with cow manure had the highest yield of grapes. Irrigation had a positive effect on all the tested indicators of the yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative fertility coefficient was high under all nutrition variants.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Outcome
relative coefficient of fertilitye0
Direction
high valuese0
Qualifier
all the tested variants of nutritione0

Verbatim

e0

“the relative coefficient of fertility in all the tested variants of nutrition had high values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure was a particularly good variant for inflorescences per productive shoot.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
cow manuree0
Outcome
number of inflorescences per productive shoote0
Direction
particularly goode0
Qualifier
three-year averagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding the number of inflorescences per productive shoot in a three-year average, a particularly good variant was the cow manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure with peat was a particularly good variant for inflorescences per productive shoot.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
combination of poultry manure and peate0
Outcome
number of inflorescences per productive shoote1
Direction
particularly goode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a particularly good variant was the cow manure and the variant with the combination of poultry manure and peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of inflorescences per productive shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral and organic fertilizers increased average cluster weight.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
mineral and different types of organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
average cluster weighte0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of mineral and different types of organic fertilizers had a positive effect on the average cluster weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure with peat gave the highest average cluster weight.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
combination of poultry manure and peate0
Outcome
average cluster weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
three-year averagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The variant with the combination of poultry manure and peat gave the highest average cluster weight in the three-year average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested nutrition variants yielded more grapes than no fertilization.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
tested variants of nutritione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
three-year averagee0
Comparator
variant without fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested variants of nutrition in the three-year average had a higher yield than the variant without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure produced the highest grape yield.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
cow manuree0
Outcome
yield of grapese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The variant with cow manure had the highest yield of grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1541 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation improved all tested yield indicators.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Vranact0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
all the tested indicators of the yielde0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation had a positive effect on all the tested indicators of the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape variety Vranac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · VitisResults differ

83 papers: 52 positive, 31 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

growing medium · yield · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.