Paper · 2005 · Genes & Genetic Systems

Differential and coordinated expression of Cbf and Cor/Lea genes during long-term cold acclimation in two wheat cultivars showing distinct levels of freezing tolerance

Shinobu Kume; Fuminori Kobayashi; Machiko Ishibashi; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
104
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The cold acclimation process in plants is primarily regulated through the signal transduction pathways that lead to the induction and enhancement of expression of different sets of Cor/Lea genes. Winter wheat 'Mironovskaya 808' (M808) exhibited a much higher level of freezing tolerance than spring wheat 'Chinese Spring' (CS), and the difference became clearer after the long-term cold acclimation. To understand the molecular basis of this cultivar difference, we isolated two CBF/DREB1 homologs, Wcbf2, which are the candidate gene for a transcription factor of the Cor/Lea genes. Expression of the Wcbf2 gene was induced rapidly by low temperature (LT) and drought but not by abscisic acid (ABA). The gene expression was temporal and at least twice up-regulated by LT. The first up-regulation occurred within 1-4 h, which might correspond to the rapid response to LT, while the second up-regulation occurred during 2-3 weeks of cold acclimation. After the second up-regulation, the amount of Wcbf2 transcript greatly decreased in CS, while it increased again in M808 after 4 weeks until 9 weeks (end of the test period). The maintenance of this high level of the Wcbf2 transcript might represent the long-term effect of cold acclimation. The activation of Cor/Lea genes followed the accumulation of Wcbf2 transcript suggested direct involvement of the Wcbf2 gene in the induction and enhancement of the Cor/Lea gene expression. The cultivar difference in freezing tolerance developed during different stages of cold acclimation can be at least partly explained by the differential and coordinated regulation of the predicted Cor/Lea gene signal transduction pathway that is mediated by the CBF/DREB1 transcription factors in common wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature rapidly induced Wcbf2 expression.

Treatment
low temperature (LT)e0
Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
Expression of the Wcbf2 genee0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Expression of the Wcbf2 gene was induced rapidly by low temperature (LT) and drought but not by abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought induced Wcbf2 expression.

Treatment
droughte0
Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
Expression of the Wcbf2 genee0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Expression of the Wcbf2 gene was induced rapidly by low temperature (LT) and drought but not by abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid did not induce Wcbf2 expression.

Treatment
abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
Expression of the Wcbf2 genee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Expression of the Wcbf2 gene was induced rapidly by low temperature (LT) and drought but not by abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold acclimation caused a second up-regulation of Wcbf2 during 2-3 weeks.

Treatment
cold acclimatione1
Outcome
second up-regulatione1
Direction
up-regulatede0
Value
2-3 weekse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The gene expression was temporal and at least twice up-regulated by LT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“while the second up-regulation occurred during 2-3 weeks of cold acclimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–948 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Chinese Spring, the Wcbf2 transcript greatly decreased after the second up-regulation.

Material
Chinese Springe1
Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
amount of Wcbf2 transcripte0
Direction
greatly decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“After the second up-regulation, the amount of Wcbf2 transcript greatly decreased in CS, while it increased again in M808 after 4 weeks until 9 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat 'Mironovskaya 808' (M808) exhibited a much higher level of freezing tolerance than spring wheat 'Chinese Spring' (CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–326 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Mironovskaya 808, the Wcbf2 transcript increased again after 4 weeks until 9 weeks of cold acclimation.

Material
Mironovskaya 808e1
Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
amount of Wcbf2 transcripte0
Direction
increased againe0
Value
4 weeks until 9 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“After the second up-regulation, the amount of Wcbf2 transcript greatly decreased in CS, while it increased again in M808 after 4 weeks until 9 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat 'Mironovskaya 808' (M808) exhibited a much higher level of freezing tolerance than spring wheat 'Chinese Spring' (CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–326 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Maintenance of a high level of Wcbf2 transcript might represent the long-term effect of cold acclimation.

Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
maintenance of this high level of the Wcbf2 transcripte0
Qualifier
long-term effect of cold acclimatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maintenance of this high level of the Wcbf2 transcript might represent the long-term effect of cold acclimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1240 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Activation of Cor/Lea genes followed Wcbf2 transcript accumulation, suggesting direct involvement of Wcbf2 in Cor/Lea induction.

Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
activation of Cor/Lea genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The activation of Cor/Lea genes followed the accumulation of Wcbf2 transcript suggested direct involvement of the Wcbf2 gene in the induction and enhancement of the Cor/Lea gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1430 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar difference in freezing tolerance can be partly explained by differential and coordinated regulation of the Cor/Lea pathway mediated by CBF/DREB1 factors.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivume0
Gene
CBF/DREB1e0
Outcome
cultivar difference in freezing tolerancee0
Qualifier
differential and coordinated regulation of the predicted Cor/Lea gene signal transduction pathwaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar difference in freezing tolerance developed during different stages of cold acclimation can be at least partly explained by the differential and coordinated regulation of the predicted Cor/Lea gene signal transduction pathway that is mediated by the CBF/DREB1 transcription factors in common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1741 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mironovskaya 808 had a much higher freezing tolerance than Chinese Spring.

Material
Mironovskaya 808e1
Outcome
freezing tolerancee1
Direction
much highere1
Comparator
Chinese Springe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat 'Mironovskaya 808' (M808) exhibited a much higher level of freezing tolerance than spring wheat 'Chinese Spring' (CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two CBF/DREB1 homologs, including Wcbf2, were isolated from wheat.

Gene
Wcbf2e0
Outcome
two CBF/DREB1 homologse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“two wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“we isolated two CBF/DREB1 homologs, Wcbf2, which are the candidate gene for a transcription factor of the Cor/Lea genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–582 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.