Abstract
A long-term field trial was conducted to determine yield trends in relation to nutrient uptake and efficiency in different rice-based cropping systems. The cropping systems had a significant effect on wet season rice yield when residues were not recycled but had no effect otherwise. Rice yield decreased after the first year of crop residue incorporation but increased every year thereafter. Rice yield was significantly affected by residual nutrients applied to dry season crops. The highest residual effect was observed in tomato and sweet pepper to which the highest nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) rates were applied. Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response. A relay crop served as a catch crop for excess nutrients and as shade to minimize sunscald effects for tomato and sweet pepper fruits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping systems affected wet-season rice yield without residue recycling.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- wet season rice yielde0
- Qualifier
- when residues were not recyclede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cropping systems had a significant effect on wet season rice yield when residues were not recycled but had no effect otherwise.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Cropping systems had no effect on wet-season rice yield when residues were recycled.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- wet season rice yielde0
- Direction
- no effecte0
- Qualifier
- otherwisee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cropping systems had a significant effect on wet season rice yield when residues were not recycled but had no effect otherwise.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice yield decreased after the first year of residue incorporation.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- Rice yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- after the first year of crop residue incorporatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rice yield decreased after the first year of crop residue incorporation but increased every year thereafter.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rice yield increased each subsequent year.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- Rice yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- every year thereaftere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rice yield decreased after the first year of crop residue incorporation but increased every year thereafter.”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual nutrients from dry-season crops significantly affected rice yield.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- residual nutrients applied to dry season cropse0
- Outcome
- Rice yielde0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rice yield was significantly affected by residual nutrients applied to dry season crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato had the highest residual nutrient effect.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- highest residual effecte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest residual effect was observed in tomato and sweet pepper to which the highest nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) rates were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet pepper had the highest residual nutrient effect.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper
Capsicum annuume0 - Outcome
- highest residual effecte0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest residual effect was observed in tomato and sweet pepper to which the highest nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) rates were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize responded well to NPK.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet pepper responded well to NPK.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- NPK applicatione0
- Outcome
- responded welle0
- Direction
- responded welle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response.”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato responded well to NPK.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- NPK applicatione0
- Outcome
- responded welle0
- Direction
- responded welle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response.”
Claim · model-written summary
Garlic responded weakly to NPK.
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativume0 - Treatment
- NPK applicatione0
- Outcome
- low responsee0
- Direction
- lowe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response.”
Claim · model-written summary
Mungbean did not respond to NPK.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- NPK applicatione0
- Outcome
- no responsee0
- Direction
- no responsee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Maize, sweet pepper, and tomato responded well to NPK application, garlic had a low response and mungbean had no response.”
Claim · model-written summary
A relay crop captured excess nutrients.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- catch crop for excess nutrientse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A relay crop served as a catch crop for excess nutrients and as shade to minimize sunscald effects for tomato and sweet pepper fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
A relay crop shaded tomato fruit against sunscald.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- minimize sunscald effects for tomatoe0
- Direction
- minimizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A relay crop served as a catch crop for excess nutrients and as shade to minimize sunscald effects for tomato and sweet pepper fruits.”
Claim · model-written summary
A relay crop shaded sweet pepper fruit against sunscald.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Outcome
- minimize sunscald effects for tomato and sweet pepper fruitse0
- Direction
- minimizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A relay crop served as a catch crop for excess nutrients and as shade to minimize sunscald effects for tomato and sweet pepper fruits.”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 125 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.