Paper · 1966 · Annals of Applied Biology

Studies on plant growth‐regulating substances: XXI. The release of pectic substances from wheat coleoptile tissue incubated with solutions of ethylenediamin etetraacetic acid

H. F. TAYLOR; R. L. WAIN

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effect on excised wheat coleoptiles of solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, at concentrations which produce a significant growth response in segments of this tissue, was investigated. The removal not only of calcium ions, but also of pectin, from coleoptiles by these solutions of the chelator was demonstrated and the implications of these findings are discussed. An increase in the plasticity of the cell walls is considered to arise from the removal of both of these constituents, and the small extension of the coleoptile segments to be a direct consequence of these changes. The concentration of EDTA required to give either the growth‐regulating response or to cause the loss of pectin and calcium was shown to approach that which also caused visible signs of toxicity, and this was taken as further support for the ‘subacute toxicity’ theory put forward earlier by Fawcett, Wain & Wightman.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA solutions removed not only calcium ions but also pectin from wheat coleoptiles.

Organ / stage
coleoptilese1
Treatment
these solutions of the chelatore1
Outcome
removal not only of calcium ions, but also of pectine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat coleoptile tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“The removal not only of calcium ions, but also of pectin, from coleoptiles by these solutions of the chelator was demonstrated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EDTA concentrations that produce a significant growth response in wheat coleoptile segments.

Treatment
solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acide2
Outcome
growth response in segmentse2
Direction
producee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat coleoptile tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, at concentrations which produce a significant growth response in segments of this tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–185 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cell wall plasticity increased in wheat coleoptiles, considered to arise from removal of calcium and pectin.

Outcome
increase in the plasticity of the cell wallse3
Qualifier
removal of both of these constituentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat coleoptile tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 · show in text ↑
e3

“An increase in the plasticity of the cell walls is considered to arise from the removal of both of these constituents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–503 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The small extension of wheat coleoptile segments is considered a direct consequence of the cell wall changes.

Outcome
small extension of the coleoptile segmentse4
Qualifier
a direct consequence of these changese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat coleoptile tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 · show in text ↑
e4

“the small extension of the coleoptile segments to be a direct consequence of these changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–599 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The EDTA concentration giving the growth response approached the concentration causing visible signs of toxicity.

Treatment
solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acide2
Outcome
visible signs of toxicitye5
Qualifier
approach that which also causede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat coleoptile tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“solutions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, at concentrations which produce a significant growth response in segments of this tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–185 · show in text ↑
e5

“or to cause the loss of pectin and calcium was shown to approach that which also caused visible signs of toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–795 · show in text ↑

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.