Paper · 1992 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Iron stress and salt stress responses of lettuce (Lactuca sativaL.)

G. W. Welkie; G. W. Miller

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A flavin‐like compound that accumulates in nutrient solutions of lettuce under osmotic stress is reportedly not a response associated with Fe stress [Cramer and Spurr, J. Plant Nutr. 8:709–719 (1985)]. We re‐examined both salt stress and iron stress in lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.) using four concentrations of chelated and non‐chelated iron. Lettuce was quite Fe efficient and plants grown with no Fe or very low Fe concentrations markedly decreased the pH of their nutrient solutions and experienced only a transient chlorosis. A yellow compound that these plants excreted in the nutrient solution was chromatographed on thin layer plates. The Rf value and fluorescence spectral characteristics of this compound corresponded to those of riboflavin. When plants received adequate Fe, NaCl or KCl in the nutrient solution did not cause roots to excrete riboflavin nor did these salts increase the excretion of riboflavin from Fe‐deficient plants. Salt‐stressed plants were smaller and excreted less riboflavin than those that were not salt stressed, regardless of Fe level. Plants that received Fe as FeSO4 (as in previous report) did not develop any obvious signs of iron chlorosis, but were not as green as those that received an equivalent concentration of Fe as Chel 138. Several factors may account for the discrepancy in the results of the two reports.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With no or very low iron, lettuce markedly lowered nutrient solution pH.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
no Fe or very low Fe concentrationse0
Outcome
pH of their nutrient solutionse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce was quite Fe efficient and plants grown with no Fe or very low Fe concentrations markedly decreased the pH of their nutrient solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With no or very low iron, lettuce experienced only transient chlorosis.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
no Fe or very low Fe concentrationse0
Outcome
transient chlorosise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce was quite Fe efficient and plants grown with no Fe or very low Fe concentrations markedly decreased the pH of their nutrient solutions and experienced only a transient chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yellow compound excreted by iron deficient lettuce had chromatographic and spectral characteristics corresponding to riboflavin.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Material
Buttercrunch cv.e1
Outcome
yellow compounde0
Qualifier
corresponded to those of riboflavine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A yellow compound that these plants excreted in the nutrient solution was chromatographed on thin layer plates. The Rf value and fluorescence spectral characteristics of this compound corresponded to those of riboflavin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate iron, NaCl did not cause lettuce roots to excrete riboflavin.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
roots to excrete riboflavine0
Direction
did not causee0
Qualifier
adequate Fee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plants received adequate Fe, NaCl or KCl in the nutrient solution did not cause roots to excrete riboflavin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With adequate iron, KCl did not cause lettuce roots to excrete riboflavin.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
KCle0
Outcome
roots to excrete riboflavine0
Direction
did not causee0
Qualifier
adequate Fee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When plants received adequate Fe, NaCl or KCl in the nutrient solution did not cause roots to excrete riboflavin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl did not increase riboflavin excretion in iron deficient lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
NaCle1
Outcome
excretion of riboflavine0
Direction
nor did these salts increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did these salts increase the excretion of riboflavin from Fe‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“NaCl or KCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–803 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KCl did not increase riboflavin excretion in iron deficient lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
KCle1
Outcome
excretion of riboflavine0
Direction
nor did these salts increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did these salts increase the excretion of riboflavin from Fe‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–952 · show in text ↑
e1

“NaCl or KCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–803 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stressed lettuce plants were smaller than unstressed plants regardless of iron level.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Salt‐stressede0
Outcome
smallere0
Direction
smallere0
Qualifier
regardless of Fe levele0
Comparator
not salt stressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt‐stressed plants were smaller and excreted less riboflavin than those that were not salt stressed, regardless of Fe level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stressed lettuce excreted less riboflavin than unstressed plants regardless of iron level.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Salt‐stressede0
Outcome
riboflavine0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
regardless of Fe levele0
Comparator
not salt stressede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt‐stressed plants were smaller and excreted less riboflavin than those that were not salt stressed, regardless of Fe level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce receiving FeSO4 showed no obvious iron chlorosis.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
FeSO4e0
Outcome
did not develop any obvious signs of iron chlorosise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants that received Fe as FeSO4 (as in previous report) did not develop any obvious signs of iron chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce receiving FeSO4 was less green than plants receiving an equivalent concentration of Fe as Chel 138.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae2
Treatment
FeSO4e1
Outcome
greene0
Direction
not as greene0
Comparator
Fe as Chel 138e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but were not as green as those that received an equivalent concentration of Fe as Chel 138”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1281 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants that received Fe as FeSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1113 · show in text ↑
e2

“lettuce (Buttercrunch cv.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–288 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.