Paper · 2012 · Soil Research

Influence of waterlogging on yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum), redox potentials, and concentrations of microelements in different soils in India and Australia

N. P. S. Yaduvanshi; T. L. Setter; S. K. Sharma; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of waterlogging relative to drained conditions on grain yield were studied in relation to soil redox potentials and microelements (Fe and Mn) in soils from India and Western Australia, using waterlogging intolerant and tolerant varieties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) The grain yield of wheat decreased significantly with increasing duration of waterlogging in sodic soils. In Indian soils, soil redox potentials decreased sharply after waterlogging and were 150 and 210 mV at 10 days after waterlogging in alkali soil at pH 8.5 and pH 9.2, respectively. Two Australian soils were similarly reduced in redox potential with values of ~200 mV at 10 days after waterlogging, and redox potentials were further reduced to 100 mV and –50 mV for soils without and with added glucose, respectively, after 40 days of waterlogging. The Indian soils tended to be 2–10 times higher in DTPA-Mn than the Australian soils, whereas the Australian soils were up to 10 times higher in DTPA-Fe than the Indian soils. These increases were up to 10 and 60 times higher, respectively, than reported critical concentrations for wheat. After 21 days of waterlogging, the Indian soils were drained, and the re-aeration resulted in an increase in redox potential and a decrease in DTPA-Fe and -Mn in soil solutions, but this occurred slowly, taking 15–25 days. The results support the hypothesis that waterlogging tolerance is a product of tolerance to anoxia and microelement toxicities, and that these are both key factors limiting plant growth during and after waterlogging. These factors may also contribute to the large differences in screening wheat varieties for waterlogging tolerance in different soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield decreased significantly with increasing duration of waterlogging in sodic soils.

Treatment
increasing duration of waterlogginge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
sodic soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield of wheat decreased significantly with increasing duration of waterlogging in sodic soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Indian alkali soils (pH 8.5 and 9.2) soil redox potential decreased sharply after waterlogging, reaching 150 and 210 mV at 10 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
soil redox potentialse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
150 and 210 mVe0
Setting
alkali soil at pH 8.5 and pH 9.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“In Indian soils, soil redox potentials decreased sharply after waterlogging and were 150 and 210 mV at 10 days after waterlogging in alkali soil at pH 8.5 and pH 9.2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two Australian soils redox potential was similarly reduced, to about 200 mV at 10 days after waterlogging.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
redox potentiale0
Direction
reducede0
Value
~200 mVe0
Setting
Australian soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two Australian soils were similarly reduced in redox potential with values of ~200 mV at 10 days after waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Australian soils without added glucose, redox potential was further reduced to 100 mV after 40 days of waterlogging.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
redox potentialse0
Direction
further reducede0
Value
100 mVe0
Qualifier
soils withoute0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“redox potentials were further reduced to 100 mV and –50 mV for soils without and with added glucose, respectively, after 40 days of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Australian soils with added glucose, redox potential was further reduced to –50 mV after 40 days of waterlogging.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
redox potentialse0
Direction
further reducede0
Value
–50 mVe0
Qualifier
with added glucosee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“redox potentials were further reduced to 100 mV and –50 mV for soils without and with added glucose, respectively, after 40 days of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian soils tended to be 2–10 times higher in DTPA-Mn than the Australian soils.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
DTPA-Mne0
Direction
highere0
Value
2–10 timese0
Comparator
Australian soilse0
Setting
Indian soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Indian soils tended to be 2–10 times higher in DTPA-Mn than the Australian soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Australian soils were up to 10 times higher in DTPA-Fe than the Indian soils.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
DTPA-Fee0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to 10 timese0
Comparator
Indian soilse0
Setting
Australian soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Australian soils were up to 10 times higher in DTPA-Fe than the Indian soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increases in soil Mn and Fe were up to 10 and 60 times higher, respectively, than reported critical concentrations for wheat.

Outcome
These increasese0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to 10 and 60 timese0
Comparator
reported critical concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These increases were up to 10 and 60 times higher, respectively, than reported critical concentrations for wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After Indian soils were drained following 21 days of waterlogging, re-aeration increased redox potential, slowly over 15–25 days.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
re-aeratione0
Outcome
redox potentiale0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the re-aeration resulted in an increase in redox potential and a decrease in DTPA-Fe and -Mn in soil solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After drainage and re-aeration of Indian soils, DTPA-Fe and -Mn in soil solutions decreased.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
re-aeratione0
Outcome
DTPA-Fe and -Mn in soil solutionse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the re-aeration resulted in an increase in redox potential and a decrease in DTPA-Fe and -Mn in soil solutions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1298 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the results as supporting that waterlogging tolerance is a product of tolerance to anoxia and microelement toxicities, both key factors limiting plant growth.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
waterlogging tolerancee0
Qualifier
tolerance to anoxia and microelement toxicitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“waterlogging tolerance is a product of tolerance to anoxia and microelement toxicities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1471 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these factors may also contribute to large differences in screening wheat varieties for waterlogging tolerance in different soils.

Outcome
differences in screening wheat varieties for waterlogging tolerancee0
Qualifier
may also contributee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These factors may also contribute to the large differences in screening wheat varieties for waterlogging tolerance in different soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1695 · show in text ↑

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.