Paper · 1985 · Annals of Applied Biology

The effects of nitrogen and sulphur nutrition on the response of Brussels sprout plants to infestation by the aphid Brevicoryne brassicae

V. M. KORITSAS; S. G. GARSED

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The effects of two levels each of nitrogen and sulphur nutrition and of infestation by Brevicoryne brassicae on the growth of Brussels sprout plants were studied in factorial experiments. All the plants receiving high nitrogen treatments grew more rapidly than those with low, but in infested plants the improvement in growth at the higher levels of nitrogen was offset by the increased size of aphid populations. Low sulphur nutrition increased the growth of plants receiving high nitrogen and of the aphids feeding on them. Leaf diffusive resistances and chlorophyll concentrations were greater with high nitrogen, but were significantly lowered by infestation in all nutrient treatments. Infestation decreased leaf total nitrogen concentration at the sites of feeding, but effects on soluble nitrogen were not significant. Removal of aphids 72 days after initial infestation did not cause marked plant recovery during the next 22 days. It is concluded that the benefits of increased yield resulting from high nitrogen levels must be balanced against the greater potential for damage by aphids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased plant growth relative to low nitrogen.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
high nitrogen treatmentse0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
more rapidlye0
Comparator
those with lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“All the plants receiving high nitrogen treatments grew more rapidly than those with low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–283 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In infested plants, greater aphid populations offset the high-nitrogen growth benefit.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
higher levels of nitrogene0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
improvement in growthe0
Direction
offsete0

Verbatim

e0

“in infested plants the improvement in growth at the higher levels of nitrogen was offset by the increased size of aphid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low sulphur increased growth of high-nitrogen plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Low sulphur nutritione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
receiving high nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low sulphur nutrition increased the growth of plants receiving high nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low sulphur increased growth of aphids feeding on high-nitrogen plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Low sulphur nutritione0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
growth of plants receiving high nitrogen and of the aphidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low sulphur nutrition increased the growth of plants receiving high nitrogen and of the aphids feeding on them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased leaf diffusive resistance and chlorophyll concentration.

Treatment
high nitrogene0
Outcome
Leaf diffusive resistances and chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf diffusive resistances and chlorophyll concentrations were greater with high nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid infestation significantly lowered leaf diffusive resistance and chlorophyll concentration across nutrient treatments.

Treatment
infestatione0
Outcome
Leaf diffusive resistances and chlorophyll concentrationse0
Direction
lowerede0
Qualifier
all nutrient treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf diffusive resistances and chlorophyll concentrations were greater with high nitrogen, but were significantly lowered by infestation in all nutrient treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation reduced total leaf nitrogen at feeding sites.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
Infestatione0
Outcome
leaf total nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
at the sites of feedinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation decreased leaf total nitrogen concentration at the sites of feeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation effects on soluble nitrogen were not significant.

Outcome
soluble nitrogene0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“effects on soluble nitrogen were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing aphids at day 72 caused no marked plant recovery over the next 22 days.

Treatment
Removal of aphids 72 days after initial infestatione0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
plant recoverye0
Direction
did not cause markede0
Qualifier
during the next 22 dayse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Removal of aphids 72 days after initial infestation did not cause marked plant recovery during the next 22 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High-nitrogen yield benefits should be balanced against increased aphid damage potential.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
benefits of increased yield resulting from high nitrogen levels must be balanced against the greater potential for damage by aphidse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the benefits of increased yield resulting from high nitrogen levels must be balanced against the greater potential for damage by aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brussels sprout plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–87 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.