Paper · 1987 · Agronomy Journal

Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1

R. L. Newell; W. W. Wilhelm

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of conservation‐tillage practices on the root environment of corn ( Zea mays L.) may differ with varying amounts of irrigation. Dryland, 50% irrigation, and 100% irrigation treatments were applied in combination with disc, no‐tillage, and a postemergence chisel treatment designed to allow rapid infiltration of irrigation water. The study was conducted during the 1980 growing season at the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station near Mead, NE, on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Typic Argiudolls). Root samples were taken to 1.50 m in 0.15‐m increments. Sampling was done at 60 (V8), 77 (V14), and 90 (R2) days after planting. Root length per soil volume as a function of depth from the soil surface was characterized using hybrid B73 × Mo17. Root length exhibited linear and often quadratic distribution over sampling depths at all sampling dates. The 100% irrigation treatment exhibited greatest total profile (0‐ to 1.5‐m) and surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) root length at R2. Dryland and 50% irrigation treatments were associated with relatively greater root length proliferation deep in the soil profile. Differences in root length distribution were not as pronounced at stages V8 and V14. Chisel and no‐tillage treatments, with crop residues at the soil surface, resulted in greater surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) and total profile root length than discing. Corn roots tended to explore the lower profile to a greater extent under water stress conditions. This phenomenon, in conjunction with soil water conservation by no‐tillage methods, may allow irrigators to increase water‐use efficiency by better use of stored soil moisture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length followed linear and often quadratic depth distributions at each sampling date.

Outcome
Root length exhibited linear and often quadratic distribution over sampling depthse0
Qualifier
at all sampling datese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length exhibited linear and often quadratic distribution over sampling depths at all sampling dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation produced greatest total-profile and surface root length at R2.

Organ / stage
R2e0
Treatment
100% irrigation treatmente0
Outcome
total profile (0‐ to 1.5‐m) and surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) root lengthe0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 100% irrigation treatment exhibited greatest total profile (0‐ to 1.5‐m) and surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) root length at R2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dryland irrigation was associated with more deep root proliferation.

Treatment
Drylande0
Outcome
root length proliferation deep in the soil profilee0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dryland and 50% irrigation treatments were associated with relatively greater root length proliferation deep in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% irrigation was associated with more deep root proliferation.

Treatment
50% irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
root length proliferation deep in the soil profilee0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dryland and 50% irrigation treatments were associated with relatively greater root length proliferation deep in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root distribution differences were weaker at V8 and V14.

Organ / stage
V8 and V14e0
Outcome
Differences in root length distributione0
Direction
not as pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in root length distribution were not as pronounced at stages V8 and V14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel tillage produced greater surface and total root length than discing.

Treatment
Chisele0
Outcome
surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) and total profile root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
discinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chisel and no‐tillage treatments, with crop residues at the soil surface, resulted in greater surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) and total profile root length than discing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage produced greater surface and total root length than discing.

Treatment
no‐tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) and total profile root lengthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
discinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chisel and no‐tillage treatments, with crop residues at the soil surface, resulted in greater surface (0‐ to 0.15‐m) and total profile root length than discing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots explored the lower soil profile more under water stress.

Treatment
water stress conditionse0
Outcome
explore the lower profilee0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn roots tended to explore the lower profile to a greater extent under water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Conservation Tillage and Irrigation Effects on Corn Root Development1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

289 papers: 208 positive, 81 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

285 papers more in this group

See all 289 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.